President Chen Shui-bian's (
What is happening, however, is that the government is treading water, the pan-blue camp is launching frenzied attacks, the TAIEX is in a free fall, the pro-localization groups stand united in support of Chen and ethnic tension is brewing.
Faced with this crisis, Taiwan is in desperate need of a third voice to restore public trust and consolidate democracy so that it will not fall victim to irresponsible political infighting and media sensationalism.
Therefore, the Taipei Society is urging politicians to stop using claims that they represent public opinion as an excuse for engaging in populism, thus destroying our democratic system.
Since the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) came to power, it has emulated the money politics of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) by leaning toward big business, which has led to a complicated relationship between the government and business circles. Some government officials have also broken the law by engaging in corruption and through dereliction of duty, which has led to the disintegration of public trust.
In 2002, the Taipei Society criticized the Chen administration for favoring big business, but the government was not willing to listen. Over the past six years, the DPP has been busy with the consolidation, expansion and distribution of power while ignoring criticism from the public, which led to a crushing defeats for the party.
Some law enforcement officials have no respect for ethics and are willing to become "deep throats" to those who specialize in exposing scandals. Law enforcement officials violating the principle of closed investigations have been seen in the Chao case -- and may be even more obvious in the case involving train derailment suspect Lee Tai-an (李泰安).
In view of this, we demand that police and prosecutors strictly abide by the "closed investigation" principle. We also call on politicians and the media not to misinteprete this principle or mislead the public as to its significance. By no means must they think of themselves as judges who decide who can be released on bail and who is guilty.
The opposition parties' overriding goal over the past six years has been to regain power. They lack democratic ideals, their performance in the legislature has been lethargic and they only engage in political infighting. People do not feel that the opposition sincerely cares for the development of the nation. This is damaging to the nation's democratic development.
A democratic society cannot be built on two diametrically opposed ideologies. I hope that the KMT and the People First Party will fulfill their duties as the opposition and build an image as benevolent political parties able to tell right from wrong that jointly seek to deepen the nation's democracy.
The media look only for political motives and not the truth, and with their rumor-mongering and defiant reporting they get involved in the political struggle, causing a great deal of confusion among the public. Worse than that, some media outlets are taking advantage of the political upheaval to fabricate news instead of reporting the truth, trampling on the privacy of citizens and violating human rights.
Here is a list of the Taipei Society's appeals:
First, the judiciary is the last line of defense for justice. It should not care whether or not the first family is involved in Chao's case, but only focus on making a thorough investigation without accepting restrictions dictated by politicians.
Second, government decisions and information should be made transparent to build public trust. Under the table dealings are often a cause of corruption.
Third, all political parties should consider the future of the nation, and understand that our democracy has been hard-won. They should avoid provoking confrontation, restore public trust and consolidate democracy.
Fourth, police, prosecutors and the media should act professionally and comply with professional ethics.
Fifth, the public should understand that it is a mistake to entrust the future of the nation to political parties and politicians. They should not hesitate to express their concerns and stop being manipulated by politicians.
The Taipei Society urges government and opposition to bring the political infighting to an end and wait patiently for the results of the investigation lest Taiwan's democracy be ruined overnight.
Hawang Shiow-duan is the chair of the Taipei Society and professor in the department of political science at Soochow University.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS