Ever since Chen Shui-bian (
Taiwan's press is scandal hungry; guilt by accusation and rumor has become a way of life and shameless legislators take advantage of this failing and play it to the maximum. It is the main means by which these otherwise incompetent legislators can maintain a place in the limelight.
This creates a situation in Taiwan where politicians posture and demand that the person they slander must step down before the courts have a chance to prove anything.
If they would let rule of law and the courts take their proper course, the scandals would evaporate and political mileage would be lost.
Today's scandal of the month involves the allegations of insider trading against not the president but his son-in-law Chao Chien-ming (
Go a step further however in the latest scandal and examine why the man who is trying hardest to claim leadership of the moral high ground in this campaign is James Soong (
Why would James Soong, a man with his own long history of involvement in corruption, seek this moral high ground?
James Soong is 64 years old. He wants to be president of Taiwan, but many people stand in his way. The next elections are in 2008, by which time he will be 66.
Soong has not had a job since 1998. He still wants to be president of Taiwan having ran for the presidency in 2000, and lost by 3 percentage points. The Chung Hsing Bills Finance Company scandal and a missing US$ 12 million may have cost him very dear.
Soong ran for vice president under Lien Chan (
Is his age such an important consideration for Soong? The efforts he goes to to keep his hair dyed jet black and his sensitivity regarding questions about his age indicates he thinks it is.
Soong does not need to be president for the money. He has been living comfortably despite not having had a job since 1998 and despite the fact that he has run in and financed two losing presidential campaigns.
Such comfortable living may be due to the fact that he has the reserves of the unreturned US$12 million (NT$384 million). Perhaps it is because of the high budget, pork barrel, and beneficiary-return days when he was provincial governor.
It could even be that politicians get a set amount of tax money for every vote cast for them and Soong is head of the popular but slowly dwindling PFP. But Soong does not need money.
What does Soong need? Soong needs power and the limelight it brings. He needs the top position of power in much the same way that Chiang Kai-shek (
Soong could have run for the Legislature and won, but that would have only made him first among equals in his party. He chose not to.
Soong could even now run for Mayor of Taipei but he will not. He has only threatened to do so to let the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) know it must reckon with him. At this point in his career, Soong will only settle for the presidency.
Who stands in Soong's way for the presidency? The biggest challenge is not Chen but the young and popular Ma Ying-jeou (
Soong must first dispose of Ma before 2008, yet he must do it in a way that doesn't alienate younger KMT supporters whose votes and perhaps campaign funds he will need. Time is running out for Soong.
Ma's threat to Soong comes from his clean image and popularity with the general public. Soong must make Ma appear weak and not yet ready to take the reins of the country.
By positioning himself at the forefront of those claiming the moral high ground over the recent scandals involving Chen, Soong can not only deflect attention away from his own sordid past but challenge Ma's status.
The scandals help to keep Soong in the limelight, but more importantly they provide him with a way to suggest his leadership qualities in a time of crisis.
Ma with his legal background had been willing to let the courts pursue justice in their normal way but Soong pressured him out of that position. Now Ma and Soong are competing to take the lead in the moralizing campaign.
Wang Jin-pyng (
Wang could be threatened with the fact that many in the pan-blue alliance don't trust his background as an ethnic Taiwanese, and then he could be enticed with the Vice Presidential position and potential right of succession.
The candidates from the pan-green coalition are natural opponents for Soong, but the least threat to him. They can be tarnished by their party links to Chen during the recent scandals. Soong has even hoped to split their ranks by calling on Vice President Annette Lu (
Chen does not stand in Soong's way. He will be gone in 2008; his long history as a whipping boy for the pan-blue attacks can be used to his advantage.
Chen has plenty of enemies in the pan-blue camp who always wanted to see him brought down. Soong will have no trouble finding allies there.
For those with memories of Soong's GIO days when he was the main cover-up man for corruption, his staking of a claim to the moral high ground is absolutely outrageous.
For those with shorter memories, his deals as provincial governor and the Chung Hsing scandal of 2000 make his position still more strange, but Taiwanese voters have short memories.
The focus of many people may be on the twists and turns of the latest scandal but long-term observers see this as only a sideshow.
The real drama is behind the scenes as candidates jockey for position in the 2008 presidential race. It is here that one sees Soong's wheeling and dealing as time runs out. Will his wiliness be up to pulling it off?
Jerome Keating is a Taiwan-based writer.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS