Ever since Chen Shui-bian (
Taiwan's press is scandal hungry; guilt by accusation and rumor has become a way of life and shameless legislators take advantage of this failing and play it to the maximum. It is the main means by which these otherwise incompetent legislators can maintain a place in the limelight.
This creates a situation in Taiwan where politicians posture and demand that the person they slander must step down before the courts have a chance to prove anything.
If they would let rule of law and the courts take their proper course, the scandals would evaporate and political mileage would be lost.
Today's scandal of the month involves the allegations of insider trading against not the president but his son-in-law Chao Chien-ming (
Go a step further however in the latest scandal and examine why the man who is trying hardest to claim leadership of the moral high ground in this campaign is James Soong (
Why would James Soong, a man with his own long history of involvement in corruption, seek this moral high ground?
James Soong is 64 years old. He wants to be president of Taiwan, but many people stand in his way. The next elections are in 2008, by which time he will be 66.
Soong has not had a job since 1998. He still wants to be president of Taiwan having ran for the presidency in 2000, and lost by 3 percentage points. The Chung Hsing Bills Finance Company scandal and a missing US$ 12 million may have cost him very dear.
Soong ran for vice president under Lien Chan (
Is his age such an important consideration for Soong? The efforts he goes to to keep his hair dyed jet black and his sensitivity regarding questions about his age indicates he thinks it is.
Soong does not need to be president for the money. He has been living comfortably despite not having had a job since 1998 and despite the fact that he has run in and financed two losing presidential campaigns.
Such comfortable living may be due to the fact that he has the reserves of the unreturned US$12 million (NT$384 million). Perhaps it is because of the high budget, pork barrel, and beneficiary-return days when he was provincial governor.
It could even be that politicians get a set amount of tax money for every vote cast for them and Soong is head of the popular but slowly dwindling PFP. But Soong does not need money.
What does Soong need? Soong needs power and the limelight it brings. He needs the top position of power in much the same way that Chiang Kai-shek (
Soong could have run for the Legislature and won, but that would have only made him first among equals in his party. He chose not to.
Soong could even now run for Mayor of Taipei but he will not. He has only threatened to do so to let the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) know it must reckon with him. At this point in his career, Soong will only settle for the presidency.
Who stands in Soong's way for the presidency? The biggest challenge is not Chen but the young and popular Ma Ying-jeou (
Soong must first dispose of Ma before 2008, yet he must do it in a way that doesn't alienate younger KMT supporters whose votes and perhaps campaign funds he will need. Time is running out for Soong.
Ma's threat to Soong comes from his clean image and popularity with the general public. Soong must make Ma appear weak and not yet ready to take the reins of the country.
By positioning himself at the forefront of those claiming the moral high ground over the recent scandals involving Chen, Soong can not only deflect attention away from his own sordid past but challenge Ma's status.
The scandals help to keep Soong in the limelight, but more importantly they provide him with a way to suggest his leadership qualities in a time of crisis.
Ma with his legal background had been willing to let the courts pursue justice in their normal way but Soong pressured him out of that position. Now Ma and Soong are competing to take the lead in the moralizing campaign.
Wang Jin-pyng (
Wang could be threatened with the fact that many in the pan-blue alliance don't trust his background as an ethnic Taiwanese, and then he could be enticed with the Vice Presidential position and potential right of succession.
The candidates from the pan-green coalition are natural opponents for Soong, but the least threat to him. They can be tarnished by their party links to Chen during the recent scandals. Soong has even hoped to split their ranks by calling on Vice President Annette Lu (
Chen does not stand in Soong's way. He will be gone in 2008; his long history as a whipping boy for the pan-blue attacks can be used to his advantage.
Chen has plenty of enemies in the pan-blue camp who always wanted to see him brought down. Soong will have no trouble finding allies there.
For those with memories of Soong's GIO days when he was the main cover-up man for corruption, his staking of a claim to the moral high ground is absolutely outrageous.
For those with shorter memories, his deals as provincial governor and the Chung Hsing scandal of 2000 make his position still more strange, but Taiwanese voters have short memories.
The focus of many people may be on the twists and turns of the latest scandal but long-term observers see this as only a sideshow.
The real drama is behind the scenes as candidates jockey for position in the 2008 presidential race. It is here that one sees Soong's wheeling and dealing as time runs out. Will his wiliness be up to pulling it off?
Jerome Keating is a Taiwan-based writer.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS