Following their recent revelations of alleged scandals and tarnishing of the image of President Chen Shui-bian (
The pan-blue camp's frenzied attacks seemingly damage the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) clean image but actually expose the closely knit pan-blue camp's "black gold community."
If we review former Presidential Office deputy secretary-general Chen Che-nan's (
Although all three cases involve corruption and profiteering, and the suspects have all denied the accusations, Hsu was released on NT$2.5 million (US$77,000) bail, while Chen Che-nan and Chao were taken into custody owing to fears that they would escape.
When investigating Hsu's case, prosecutors were able to implement the principle of closed investigations, and the media also stayed within bounds and did not seek to direct the handling of the case.
Strangely, however, in Chen Che-nan's and Chao's cases, the news media are able to publish the latest information as soon as investigators find new clues. The difference in treatment of Chen Che-nan and Chao compared with Hsu clearly shows where most of the media belongs on the political spectrum.
The pan-blue camp has sensationalized the Chen Che-nan corruption and the Chao insider trading scandals as a way to question the DPP's anti-corruption credentials, but it fails to mention its own corruption. It has made strenuous efforts to get Liang Po-hsun (
Liang accused both the pan-blue and pan-green camps of having accepted political donations from him in the past, but he is dissatisfied with the DPP government because even after apparently accepting his donations, it did nothing to please him.
Liang's accusations actually provide evidence of the KMT's tradition of "taking money to do things." Accepting money without doing what you promised is fraud; corruption is carrying out illegal activities in return for money.
Many of the pan-blue camp's actions only serve to highlight their close-knit "black-gold community." How could the people of Taiwan invite them back to power without the greatest trepidation? If they want to eliminate corrupt politics, they should make sure that the pan-blue camp remains in opposition while getting rid of the few rotten apples in the DPP government. This is the only way to eradicate black-gold politics in Taiwan.
The slogan should not be, "Chen must resign in order to maintain clean politics and safeguard Taiwan." Rather, it should be, "Do not allow the KMT back, and there will be no black gold."
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS