So President Chen Shui-bian (
There are those within the pan-green camp who might be happy at the prospect of Premier Su Tseng-chang (
But the president's decision poses dangers for Su. After all, it is unlikely the move will defuse any of the scandals plaguing the administration. The insider-trading scandal that has ensnared Chen's son-in-law reflects on the first family's honor and integrity.
As Presidential Office Spokesman David Lee (
The stain of corruption has tainted Chen. Even if he is completely honest, he has surrounded himself with the crooked and the corrupt -- and in the case of former top adviser Chen Che-nan (
And this is what brings us back to Su. The premier faces a number of difficulties as he tries to balance his responsibilities as the nation's chief executive with the need to distance himself from Chen.
The basic problem is that, regardless of what happens to Chen, Su is going to be left with the unenviable task of cleaning up the mess. It is Su that must deal with the aftermath of the various scandals that have erupted. It is Su who will have to take the flak for the landslides, floods, typhoons, crop damage, financial problems and myriad other issues that a premier has to deal with each year.
Contrast this with Ma, who has no national responsibilities. As Taipei mayor, he is responsible for the most developed and wealthiest part of the nation, which may have periodic problems, but obviously not on the scale of the rest of the country. So Ma isn't likely to have to make many decisions of national import. He will appeal to voters because all he has to do is sit on the sidelines and snipe at the administration with carefully crafted press releases.
But Su is in the trenches. He has to get himself down in the dirt of the day-to-day operations of the government. Su will have to demonstrate whether or not he has the ability to lead this nation long before he ever has a chance to run for head of state.
One suspects that Ma isn't being entirely sincere when he implies Chen should step down. He must be satisfied with things as they are now: The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration is in disarray, beset by scandal and unable to find its direction. His most likely rival for the presidency is at the mercy of forces beyond his control, and Ma will have ample opportunities to let his henchmen knock the premier down a notch or two whenever a problem erupts.
Of course, what is best for Ma is not necessarily best for the country. The people should ask themselves why it is that Su is where he is now. They should ask themselves if they would prefer a leader who is unafraid to risk his political capital simply to get things done, as is Su, or one who calculates from the shadows and takes advantage of others' mistakes, as does Ma.
If Taiwan chooses the spider, it shouldn't cry when it gets bitten.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS