Unsurprisingly, the Legislative Yuan ended its spring session in chaos, failing to pass a number of critical bills that seriously affect the livelihoods of ordinary people and the national interest.
Amendments to the Statute Governing the Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (兩岸人民關係條例) failed for a third time after physical confrontation between the governing and opposition parties. The pan-greens stopped the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP) from putting the amendment to a vote on the legislative floor. The pan-blues, in return, blocked all of the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) proposals, and the legislature went into its summer recess on Tuesday amid pandemonium.
While legislators never cease to entertain -- or embarrass -- the public by putting on antics such as water-fights, cup-tossing, spitting and all-out wrestling matches, one expects that these so-called lawmakers could at least have made themselves useful during the past three months. They could have, say, voted on bills -- the reason they were elected to office.
But no.
Other than passing amendments to the Statute Governing Charity Donations (
In all, 75 bills were passed, even less than the 86 passed in the previous session.
A number of critical bills that affect the country's economic performance and development failed to pass, including budget bills pertaining to public infrastructure, flood-control projects, investment projects by state-owned enterprises and unfreezing around NT$200 billion in revenue meant for the central government.
This is not to mention the long-stalled review of the state public prosecutor-general nominee, approval of Control Yuan members and the arms-procurement plan. Also, the draft labor insurance supervisory commission organic law, which provides for more rigorous management of the nation's pension funds, went nowhere.
And what about amendments to the Organic Law of the Executive Yuan (
Leaving these major bills in abeyance not only seriously hobbles the government's operations, but has also halted a number of major public construction plans.
While the DPP caucus had urged holding a provisional session during the summer recess to deliberate on key bills, the pan-blue camp said it would not agree to such a meeting if the pan-greens continued to block the PFP's proposal on direct links.
It is apparent that to the pan-blues, passing the PFP's amendment on direct links and allowing direct travel between Taiwan and China mattered more than the lives and safety of the people who live in flood-prone areas.
One can't help but wonder who would really benefit from direct links. Would it be the general public?
Or would it be a handful of business conglomerates? Or would it be to further the goal of "ultimate unification" between Taiwan and China, as KMT Chairman Ma Ying?jeou (
Let's hope that the lawmakers come to their senses soon, rather than holding Taiwan hostage to their own self-interest.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS