President Chen Shui-bian's (
I believe that most Taiwanese have never contemplated whether the DPP administration has turned the judiciary into an independent tool different from the judiciary run by the KMT party-state and whether the judiciary really is able to resist political forces. The profound questions of whether the judiciary can remain independent or whether it will dance to the tune of the pan-blue camp or the pro-blue camp media outlets are important issues that we have to give serious thought to.
Chao's case highlights that the power struggle within the DPP has intensified. Not only are the four DPP "heavyweights," Vice President Annette Lu (
Let's leave aside which political faction Kuo belongs to within the DPP. Kuo used to be the right-hand man of former DPP chairman Hsu Hsin-liang (許信良). But when Hsu received financial aid from former KMT chairman and presidential candidate Lien Chan (連戰) to campaign in 2000 to split the DPP vote in the presidential election but still suffered a crushing defeat, Kuo felt where the wind was blowing and abandoned Hsu to join the DPP's Justice Alliance faction. In other words, rather than saying that Kuo is one of Chen's proteges, it would be more correct to say that he bends with the wind.
The question at issue, however, is not whether or not Kuo is an unprincipled and fickle politician. What we should be discussing are his recent suggestions. Kuo wants Chen to relinquish his hold on military power and the DPP to hold a presidential primary for the 2008 presidential elections ahead of time, in effect bringing about a transfer of power.
Kuo has also suggested that the DPP's four heavyweights jointly make major national decisions and resolve internal party disputes, adding that all important decisions should be made collectively. The problem is that the president's power is clearly stated in the Constitution and cannot simply be transferred. Even if the DPP chooses a presidential candidate for 2008, he or she will not be able to usurp the power of the incumbent president. More importantly, apart from the pan-blue camp being overcome by joy if Chen does become a lame duck ahead of time, it will not bring any advantage to the pan-green camp.
That is why the four DPP heavyweights have jointly issued a statement expressing their full support for Chen and asked the DPP legislative caucus to unite and remain calm. They have also called for firm support for Chen so that he can effectively lead the nation. DPP legislators across faction lines have also said that they will help the central leadership to consolidate. Although the two opposing forces within the DPP will not necessarily reach a consensus on this issue, nine non-governmental localization organizations held a joint press conference to denounce the behavior of some pan-green politicians seeking political gain amid the recent scandals. They called on supporters to back the president and his top leadership.
Clearly, pan-green supporters have already passed judgment. Acting Kaohsiung Mayor Yeh Chu-lan (葉菊蘭) has come forward to condemn the "political vultures" within the DPP. Ng Chiau-tong (黃昭堂), chairman of the World United Formosans for Independence (台獨聯盟), has also urged Taiwanese to unite in support of Chen. In short, just as Senior Adviser to the President Peng Ming-min (彭明敏) has said, "Chen has to hang in there and continue on with his national duties and reforms, for he has run out of other options." The pan-green camp has now come to an agreement and will not fall into the trap orchestrated by the pan-blues. The DPP must also seek to root out those attempting to incite conflict. While the pan-blue camp is portraying KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) as an impeccable politician and chipping away at Chen's image, pro-green camp organizations are now poised to turn the tables.
With the political scene in a shambles, pan-green supporters have once again demonstrated their wisdom and refused to lose their cool, for they are aware that they have a historical mission ahead of them. Will Taiwan return to the hands of an alien regime? Will they sit idly by as China and the pan-blues perform their "Eventual Unification Symphony" and put an end to Taiwan's democratization and localization?
It is our choice but future generations will not be able to escape it. The question of whether we want to support Chen or get rid of him must be considered against this background. Only then will we be able to take our destiny in our own hands without being confused by others. This must be our overriding concern.
Chin Heng-wei is the editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS