Much is being made by the pan-blue press in Taiwan about a statement US Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick made during a hearing of the US House International Relations Committee, in which he said: "Independence means war."
I attended the hearing, and find the focus on this particular statement rather puzzling: Zoellick did indeed make it, but it was a brief, emotional outburst during a heated debate with Congresswoman and former ambassador Diane Watson, a Democrat from California, regarding President Chen Shui-bian's (
Zoellick was obviously exhausted from the long journey from Nigeria, where he had lengthy negotiations deep into the night about the Darfur situation. The members of Congress rightly applauded him for the breakthrough achieved in Africa.
It would be much more interesting to note that at least four of the committee members expressed their indignation at the fact that the administration didn't grant Chen an overnight stopover. They argued that such a gesture doesn't have anything to do with the US' lack of diplomatic ties with Taiwan, but rather with the respect due to a democratically-elected president.
Such respect was especially necessary after the White House rolled out the red carpet for a distinctly undemocratic leader of China.
What message does this send about the importance the US attaches to democracy? The supporters of Taiwan independence have always emphasized that they want peaceful coexistence with China.
China is threatening war, not Taiwan. To the Taiwanese who lived through the 228 Incident of 1947 in which tens of thousands were massacred by Chinese troops, and the subsequent 40 years of dictatorship under the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), any "unification" with China means yet another round of subjugation by foreign dictators.
The US and other Western nations applauded when Taiwan made its transition to democracy. The Taiwanese who worked hard to bring this transition about are expecting the next step to be full and equal acceptance by the international community. The Republic of China (ROC )government lost its international recognition in the 1970s because it still claimed to be government of all of China -- in fact, that is still in the decrepit ROC Constitution which the US wants Taiwan not to change.
By clinging to its anachronistic "one China" policy, and by telling Taiwan not to change the "status quo," the US is preventing the nation from ridding itself of the anachronistic remnants of its repressive past.
At the same, it gives totalitarian China a say in the decision about Taiwan's future that should be made by the Taiwanese people themselves. Imagine if someone had suggested in 1776 that the future of the American colonies should be "acceptable to people on both sides of the Atlantic."
Is it too much to ask for the international community (including the US) to help bring about a normalization of relations with Taiwan, instead of letting themselves be used by the folks in Beijing who are threatening war?
Let's focus on the positive words spoken at the hearing, such as the following by Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, a Republican from Florida.
"And many members of our committee have already asked what steps the administration has taken to normalize diplomatic relations with Taiwan, to further trade relations with our eighth-largest trading partner through a free trade agreement, and to convince China to arrive at peaceful coexistence with Taiwan as friendly neighbors.
"And I'd like to reiterate those sentiments and encourage our administration to help the Taiwanese people in their plight to further the ideals of freedom and democracy, ideals that are common ideals between our two peoples. And because of this mutual relationship, our struggle remains to work together for a more democratic and safe world. And the US has always emphasized that the dispute between Taiwan and China needs to be resolved peacefully.
"However, as we've seen, China is modernizing its military with the aim of threatening or attacking Taiwan and preventing the US from coming to Taiwan's assistance. So as we fight for the principles of democracy to be recognized throughout the world, we must stand by Taiwan as it seeks to strengthen its young democratic structure, to expand its economy in order to become fully recognized by its Asian neighbors and to be fully integrated by the international community.
"And it was an honor for my city, Miami, to host President Chen in his stop a few months ago, and it was very encouraging to see so many members of Congress participating ... [in] Miami to congratulate President Chen for what he has been doing. And it's a shame that we were not able to do so again."
Ros-Lehtinen has the courage and the vision that Zoellick lacked.
Gerrit van der Wees is editor of Taiwan Communique, a publication based in Washington.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS