Much is being made by the pan-blue press in Taiwan about a statement US Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick made during a hearing of the US House International Relations Committee, in which he said: "Independence means war."
I attended the hearing, and find the focus on this particular statement rather puzzling: Zoellick did indeed make it, but it was a brief, emotional outburst during a heated debate with Congresswoman and former ambassador Diane Watson, a Democrat from California, regarding President Chen Shui-bian's (
Zoellick was obviously exhausted from the long journey from Nigeria, where he had lengthy negotiations deep into the night about the Darfur situation. The members of Congress rightly applauded him for the breakthrough achieved in Africa.
It would be much more interesting to note that at least four of the committee members expressed their indignation at the fact that the administration didn't grant Chen an overnight stopover. They argued that such a gesture doesn't have anything to do with the US' lack of diplomatic ties with Taiwan, but rather with the respect due to a democratically-elected president.
Such respect was especially necessary after the White House rolled out the red carpet for a distinctly undemocratic leader of China.
What message does this send about the importance the US attaches to democracy? The supporters of Taiwan independence have always emphasized that they want peaceful coexistence with China.
China is threatening war, not Taiwan. To the Taiwanese who lived through the 228 Incident of 1947 in which tens of thousands were massacred by Chinese troops, and the subsequent 40 years of dictatorship under the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), any "unification" with China means yet another round of subjugation by foreign dictators.
The US and other Western nations applauded when Taiwan made its transition to democracy. The Taiwanese who worked hard to bring this transition about are expecting the next step to be full and equal acceptance by the international community. The Republic of China (ROC )government lost its international recognition in the 1970s because it still claimed to be government of all of China -- in fact, that is still in the decrepit ROC Constitution which the US wants Taiwan not to change.
By clinging to its anachronistic "one China" policy, and by telling Taiwan not to change the "status quo," the US is preventing the nation from ridding itself of the anachronistic remnants of its repressive past.
At the same, it gives totalitarian China a say in the decision about Taiwan's future that should be made by the Taiwanese people themselves. Imagine if someone had suggested in 1776 that the future of the American colonies should be "acceptable to people on both sides of the Atlantic."
Is it too much to ask for the international community (including the US) to help bring about a normalization of relations with Taiwan, instead of letting themselves be used by the folks in Beijing who are threatening war?
Let's focus on the positive words spoken at the hearing, such as the following by Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, a Republican from Florida.
"And many members of our committee have already asked what steps the administration has taken to normalize diplomatic relations with Taiwan, to further trade relations with our eighth-largest trading partner through a free trade agreement, and to convince China to arrive at peaceful coexistence with Taiwan as friendly neighbors.
"And I'd like to reiterate those sentiments and encourage our administration to help the Taiwanese people in their plight to further the ideals of freedom and democracy, ideals that are common ideals between our two peoples. And because of this mutual relationship, our struggle remains to work together for a more democratic and safe world. And the US has always emphasized that the dispute between Taiwan and China needs to be resolved peacefully.
"However, as we've seen, China is modernizing its military with the aim of threatening or attacking Taiwan and preventing the US from coming to Taiwan's assistance. So as we fight for the principles of democracy to be recognized throughout the world, we must stand by Taiwan as it seeks to strengthen its young democratic structure, to expand its economy in order to become fully recognized by its Asian neighbors and to be fully integrated by the international community.
"And it was an honor for my city, Miami, to host President Chen in his stop a few months ago, and it was very encouraging to see so many members of Congress participating ... [in] Miami to congratulate President Chen for what he has been doing. And it's a shame that we were not able to do so again."
Ros-Lehtinen has the courage and the vision that Zoellick lacked.
Gerrit van der Wees is editor of Taiwan Communique, a publication based in Washington.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS