In spite of any friction between Taiwan and the US caused by the US during President Chen Shui-bian's (
The first is the US announcement that it seeks to normalize diplomatic relations with Libya. Although Chen's recent visit to Libya was a diplomatic breakthrough, pro-China forces slammed the visit as an attempt to consort with a rogue nation in definance of the US. On May 15, three days after Chen had returned to Taiwan, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice announced that the US and Libya would renew full diplomatic ties, and that the US would remove Libya from its list of state sponsors of terrorism.
The announcement no doubt embarrassed pro-China forces in Taiwan. They had just finished extolling the importance of the US-Taiwan relationship and criticizing Chen; their true colors would have been revealed if they were to suddenly shift gears and adopt an anti-US stance to keep the heat on Chen. However, being China-friendly, their true nature is to oppose the US -- drumming up US-Taiwan relations at the time was merely part of a strategy to undermine Taiwan.
Libya's interaction with democratic Taiwan is beneficial to the former's image, and will promote improvements in Libya's behavior. This is something that the US looks forward to, especially as North Korea and Iran, with China's support, continue to lock horns with the US. Resuming diplomatic ties with Libya after a quarter century of enmity is a constructive development in the US effort to forge a united front against terrorism. Muammar Qaddafi's comments regarding China's oppression of Taiwan during his meeting with Chen, were especially moving. Such boldness and support is rare.
Before all this, US President George W. Bush met Chinese human rights advocates Yu Jie (余杰), Wang Yi (王怡) and Li Boguang (李柏光) at the White House on April 11. The meeting, which was extended to an hour from the originally scheduled half-hour, took place in a residential room, and was very cordial and warm. The human rights advocates discussed with Bush problems pertaining to religion in China and their own families' situations there. Afterwards, they even prayed together.
Although the meeting was nominally focused on the topic of human rights in China, it had more to do with religion which is an important aspect of human rights. The meeting's intense focus on religion became especially controversial when a non-Christian member of the human rights coterie did not attend the meeting, sparking speculation among dissidents. China capitalized on the buzz to advance its divide-and-conquer strategy.
In the past, US presidents have met with exiled proponents of democracy. Nowadays, not only has the president met with dissidents from China, but their topic of discussion has often been religion, indicating that the US hopes that freedom of religion can be the starting point in promoting democracy in China. The inclusiveness of religion can solve the disputes within China's democratic movement.
The democratization of China in turn could generate a resolution to the Taiwan problem. However, recent disputes among Chinese democratic proponents reveal just how complex the dynamics of the Chinese democratic movement are. It is hoped that such proponents will come to appreciate the greater cause and set aside their disputes.
Religious freedom thrives in Taiwan, and the country needs to capitalize on this to promote democratic reform in China, and to confront that nation's united front tactics.
Paul Lin is a New York-based political commentator.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS