As staunch supporters of your policies and your administration, we have high hopes for your forthcoming meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao (
We hope you will continue to stress the issue of human rights and reaffirm your commitment and unwavering conviction in spite of the difficult and delicate situation the US is currently facing.
Your speech delivered at Tsinghua University three years ago was salutary and enlightening for the Chinese people; it sent a clear message to the whole world over what you stand for -- a defining moment of your presidency.
Engaging the egregious regime in dialogue is essential to help maintain regional stability and the prosperity of the world, especially at a time when the US has slipped into a symbiotic relationship with a rising power that is neither free nor democratic.
However, the stark reality we are facing now is that these two global powers are clearly on a conflicting course and, potentially, a confrontational one. The rise of China is not a peaceful one, as Beijing insists.
History has shown that the rapid rise of a national power tends to give rise to bloody confrontation with its rivals; a totalitarian regime invariably uses nationalism and patriotic sentiment to bolster its legitimacy.
Playing to patriotic sentiment and rapidly expanding its military strength -- ominously unjustifiable for more than a decade -- are the characteristics of the People's Republic of China's (PRC) foreign policy.
It's well known that the PRC harbors a host of serious internal problems that might erupt at any time. Clearly, the regime is trying to shift the resentments of its people against its bankrupt communist ideology to hold on to its entrenched power.
Its belligerent stance in dealing with Taiwan is threatening the stability and peace of the Pacific region. Specifically, Beijing's "Anti-Secession" Law rapes the wishes and will of the Taiwanese people; it's an affront to the cardinal principle of the UN and a mockery of the bedrock values that the US cherishes and upholds -- freedom, democracy and human rights.
We all fervently hope and pray that China will undergo a benign metamorphosis and become a "stakeholder" that contributes to the peace and prosperity of the world.
We also believe that a free and democratic Taiwan serves as inspiration for the Chinese people; it's a shining example of a remarkable evolution -- from an erstwhile despotic regime from the Chinese mainland to a freely elected democratic nation for the 23 million native Taiwanese -- in the Western Pacific.
Clearly, a viable democratic Taiwan is a linchpin for the security and stability of Asia. However, Taiwan has been for years unfairly ignored and shut off from the international community. It's the disgrace and injustice of the century.
As the leader of the free world and a champion of freedom and democracy, the US should not close its eyes to cruel reality by betraying a democratic nation and the people who have been left in the lurch by the international community; it would be tantamount to shelving the principles the US stands for.
Most Taiwanese Americans came to the US to seek opportunities and, above all, freedom. We Taiwanese Americans admire the commitment you have made and sacrifices that this great country is making in order to spread democracy and freedom throughout the world. Taiwan is one of the miraculous success stories in East Asia that has embodied this lofty principle.
Over the last few months we have been dismayed by the denigrating remarks made by some US officials in order to appease China. Mr. President, please do not let Taiwan down.
We all applaud your praise of Taiwan as a model democracy with an open economy on your recent trip to Asia. We hope you will continue to stress the theme when Hu visits you this week.
Furthermore, we hope Taiwan's leaders can be accorded more dignified treatment when they visit the US. Please allow the democratic nation of Taiwan dignity -- no more and no less -- according to the common practice and protocol of the international society.
Thank you.
Andrew Chang
Professor emeritus, Thunderbird
Glendale, Arizona
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS