Due to former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan's (
First, the KMT has no defense against China. The forum's five major themes -- economy and trade, direct transportation links, tourism, agriculture and finance -- all echo Beijing's needs, purposely creating a favorable atmosphere for the complete opening of investments in China.
The party ignores that such actions will increase China's attraction, leading to the rapid marginalization of Taiwan's economy. Not to mention that Hu Angang (胡安綱), a member of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, recently stated that since Taiwan's economy is greatly dependent on China, Beijing can impose economic sanctions on Taiwan at any time it chooses. With the enemy's threat still ringing in our ears, the KMT still fails to prepare its defenses.
Second, the KMT has not analyzed the current business situation. The party claimed it was hosting the forum to find a way out for Taiwan's economy, to "boost the economy, save the poor," implying that China is the solution to Taiwan's economic downturn.
But statistics show that Taiwanese business investments in China have exceeded 50 percent of GDP, which is higher than that of Japan (0.6 percent), South Korea (2 percent), and the US (0.3 percent). These investments also account for half of total foreign investment in China. Anyone who can think is able to see that excessive Taiwanese investment in China is the culprit behind industrial and capital outflows. China is not a way out for Taiwan, but a dead end.
Third, the KMT is not taking a critical view of China. The party often boycotts the government and talks about the demise of Taiwan, but it praises China without reviewing actual conditions there. In the pursuit of economic growth, China has deprived laborers of their basic rights and oppressed justice, causing serious confrontations. The KMT pays no attention to this. Even the Beijing newspaper the China Youth Daily dared to report the truth: More than 70 percent of China's wealth (about US$960 billion) is in the hands of less than 0.02 percent of its population (about 230,000 people), illustrating the gap between rich and poor.
Fourth, the KMT is irresponsible. The party is blind to China's crises, while bragging about its prosperity. It hides its Sinicization behind the excuse of globalization and promotes investing in China. It even accuses Taiwan of isolating itself from the world behind the "no haste, be patient" policy.
However, excessive investments in China are precisely the cause of Taiwan's economic downturn, insufficient domestic investment and the fall in consumption and wealth, not to mention the economic criminals who invest money in China and abandon their debts in Taiwan. Such investments create wealth in China while causing suffering to the people of Taiwan. They indirectly help China achieve its goal of invading Taiwan. The KMT has failed to fulfill its responsibilities toward Taiwan.
Fifth, the KMT lacks backbone. It loses all its integrity whenever it meets China. In Taiwan, its members vow to uphold the Republic of China (ROC), but whenever they meet Chinese officials, they remain silent, as if they had never pledged allegiance to the ROC's national flag.
They only dare to undertake their irrational obstruction of the arms procurement plan, paralyzing Taiwan's national defenses, but say nothing about the 800 ballistic missiles China has aimed at this country and dare not demand that Beijing dismantle them. They talk about Taiwan in satirical tones, but their tongues become sweet and gentle when speaking about China. How can we expect this spineless party to "have its own interpretation" once Taiwan really accepts the "one China" principle?
The KMT-CCP forum is a farce. We in the four Taiwan societies want to remind the public to face China's attempts to divide Taiwan and its "united front" strategy, which is aimed at confusing the international community. As for the Executive Yuan's planned conference on the sustainable development of Taiwan's economy, the four societies also want to remind the government that the solution to the nation's economic problems lies in improving the domestic investment environment, developing a knowledge-based economy and the upgrading its industry.
As an island state, Taiwan can find business opportunities all over the world. It must not isolate itself in China. From a political or economic perspective, the opening of direct flights and transportation links at this stage is tantamount to digging our own grave. Those in power must think twice before they act.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS