The opposition parties are living in the past.
How else can one explain the resurrection of the 319 Shooting Truth Investigation Special Committee on Tuesday? It is more than two years since the presidential election, and the pan-blues have put Taiwan right back where it started.
No one has ever presented a shred of credible evidence to prove that the shooting was a conspiracy. This is such a vital fact that it warrants repetition: No one has presented evidence of a conspiracy.
Not one document. Not one fiber of fabric. Not a single hair. Not one strand of DNA. No film footage. No still photographs. No weapons. No testimony from inside sources. No tape recordings. No fingerprints. No eyewitnesses. Nothing.
Nothing at all to indicate that the elected president of this democratic state, flawed as it may be, was involved in a conspiracy that would have required dozens, if not hundreds, of participants to execute properly -- with no certainty of what effect it would have on the election once it had been carried out.
That's another point that should be raised twice to emphasize its importance: If President Chen Shui-bian (
If he wanted to make sure he stayed in power, why didn't he just declare martial law? Ban the main opposition leaders from running? Stuff the ballot boxes? He could have done hundreds of things that would have guaranteed the result, while giving the appearance of a democratic contest.
But according to the conspiracy-peddlers, he didn't. He had someone give him a flesh wound with a homemade pistol, then covered it up and waited a day for the poll results.
It is insulting to one's intelligence to be asked to believe that.
Furthermore, evidence that the shooting was carried out by a lone nutcase is legion. The police collected bullet fragments. Shell casings. Video footage. Eyewitness testimony. Forensic analysis by a host of experts. The police spent months painstakingly gathering evidence and tracking down leads. They matched clothing. They positively identified the shooter. They found the man who sold him a homemade gun. They gathered testimony from people who knew the shooter. Even his family said he had done it -- until deciding a year later to change their story, with the help of a prominent pan-blue figure.
And what about the simple, inescapable logic of self-interest? Is there no one, inside or outside of the president's circle of trust, who would have something to gain by exposing a conspiracy that would rock the very foundations of this country's political system?
Are the thousands of broadcast and print journalists in on the plot as well? Are they all Chen supporters? Clearly not. So were they all bought off?
Why did the pan-blue camp's first unconstitutional committee not find any conclusive proof of their claim? They submitted a voluminous report that was a cold fish even among pan-blue supporters. It had charts. It had diagrams. It had speculation. It had lots of pages. But it had no evidence.
So was the committee in on the conspiracy too?
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is again showing its disregard for the rule of law, merely because it can't live with the reality that it isn't in power.
KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
The public is sick of sham conspiracy theories.
It's time for the pan-blues to put up or shut up.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS