The 24 ministers of the new Palestinian government led by the militant Islamic Hamas movement are starting their jobs with empty coffers. Thousands of civil servants and members of the Palestinian security forces are waiting impatiently for their salaries.
Meanwhile, since its unexpected defeat in the Jan. 25 parliamentary elections, the Fatah party of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas waits on the sidelines for Hamas to fail.
For the past more than two months, Hamas leaders have been traveling to neighboring Arab countries pleading for financial assistance. Despite pledges of support, the money has yet to arrive.
The monthly salaries of the Palestinian Authority's 140,000 civil servants and members of the security forces total around US$120 million.
At the Arab League summit in Khartoum last week, Hamas had asked for US$170 million support per month. Conference participants promised US$50 million, a sum Palestinian Prime Minister Ismael Haneya said was "far from enough to solve the crisis."
The suspension of direct aid from the US and EU, as well as Israel's refusal to transfer more than US$50 million a month in custom duties which it collects on behalf of the authority, leave a huge hole in the budget.
"The salaries we get from the Palestinian Authority are our only income," said Khaled Abu Shaban, a 34-year-old civil servant in Gaza City on Thursday. "We don't have any other sources for making a living."
Hamas' cash problem has also made it unable thus far to pay the monthly stipend the Ministry of Prisoners Affairs gives the families of militants jailed in Israel.
"Liars," fumed Rafiq Hamdouna, the head of the Palestinian Prisoners Association, referring to a repeated promise by the Hamas leadership to pay the March allowance "within the next two days."
Hamas has made the prisoners issue a top priority and the difficulty it faces in continuing support to their families is another example of the problems it will have to keep its election promises and meet the expectations of its voters.
Meanwhile in Ramallah, Abbas is seeking to keep more and more authority in his own hands and restore powers to the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), in an attempt to partially bypass the Hamas government and overcome the authority's isolation.
On Wednesday night, he signed a presidential decree bringing the Palestinian border crossings under his control. Officials close to him justified the move by saying the EU threatened to withdraw its monitors from the key Rafah crossing between Gaza and Egypt in response to Hamas assuming power.
Abbas has also halted a long-promised reform of the security forces -- demanded by the EU and US three years ago but never fully implemented -- which would have brought them all under a single umbrella and under the jurisdiction of the interior minister.
Outgoing Interior Minister Nasser Yousef, a Fatah member, stressed last week that the bulk of the security organizations, including the largest one, the National Security, would remain under the authority of the president. Only the police and several smaller ones which were already under the authority of the interior minister would remain so.
Abbas is also trying to revive the PLO's Political Department headed by Fatah official Farouk Kadoumi, which would then deal with foreign affairs, sources in Fatah say.
Hamas has appointed Mahmoud al-Zahar, considered a radical in the movement, as its foreign minister.
Abbas, elected president a year before the legislative elections, may also want to revive the PLO's National Fund, as an alternative address for financial support, they say.
Although Israel has refused to revive peace talks unless Hamas recognize the Jewish state and renounce violence, the 71-year-old president has also called for talks through the PLO's Negotiations Department, pointing out that it was the PLO which signed the 1993 interim Oslo accords with Israel.
Hamas, however, has refused demands by Abbas and Fatah that it recognize the PLO as the "sole representative of the Palestinian people."
Some analysts say the moves by Abbas to transfer powers to the PLO and his own office go so far as to indicate the establishment of a parallel government.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS