Cheng Chung-mo's (
At least that is the sincere hope of those of us who are getting worn down by the around-the-clock sensational media coverage of the story. However, among all the gossip and hearsay disguised by the media as "serious news" in this latest saga, there has been insufficient discussion of why Cheng should step down.
If the real justification for demanding Cheng's resignation isn't stressed, the point of his departure would seem to be lost in the tide of useless information the media is feeding the public about the story.
Without question, Cheng's decision to step down was the right one and absolutely necessary. When the local Chinese-language media initially published pictures of him entering the motel with a young woman, if he had immediately declared his decision to resign, it would have been the correct choice. Waiting a few days before finally succumbing to public pressure diminishes Cheng's standing.
Cheng had to resign because he had tarnished the credibility and the image of the Counsel of Grand Justices, as well as the Judicial Yuan vice. Had he remained in his posts, the tasteless jokes and speculation would have lingered on, diminishing the image of the institutions. The damage to the trustworthiness of these two institutions, which are supposed to be embodiments of law and justice, would be too great.
Even if Cheng was telling the truth, and that the woman was indeed suffering a stomach ache and needed to use the bathroom of the motel, he should still resign. Entering a motel room with a young woman alone by itself is highly improper precisely because it raises too much speculation about the real reason behind the act.
Having said that, it should be pointed out that there were no real legal grounds to ask Cheng to resign. Entering a motel room with a woman is not illegal and nothing else can be proved to have happened. In the absence of legal reasons, Cheng's resignation was a moral and ethical issue -- that is, he had sufficient conscience to save the Council of Grand Justices and the Judicial Yuan vice from further public mockery. Chen's resignation was an act of self-sacrifice in this regard. From a member of the Council of Grand Justices, people rightfully demand higher moral and ethical standards.
Cheng's resignation should end the controversy. He and the woman in question should be left alone. Whatever their relationship, it is strictly private and a personal matter of the parties involved.
Unfortunately, there are some members of the Legislative Yuan who seem to be having far too much fun with the whole issue and don't want it to end too soon. Some of them are even saying that there should be an investigation into whether Cheng told the truth and into the exact nature of the relationship between Cheng and the woman. That would be taking things too far. One cannot help but ask why the Legislative Yuan does not demand of itself half of what it demands from Cheng.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS