It's been a classic Thaksin Shinawatra week, complete with drama, plot twists, tears and the Thai prime minister's ongoing love affair with his people, all broadcast live on television.
In the aftermath of Thailand's snap election on Sunday -- a bit of a farcical affair since essentially only one party contested it -- the careworn caretaker prime minister appeared on national TV on Monday night to explain to the public why he felt entitled to remain in his job.
Admittedly, only about 28 million out of 45 million eligible voters had exercised their right to vote, the worst turnout since the 1997 Constitution was adopted, penalizing citizens for not voting.
And admittedly about 10 million people had ticked their ballots "no vote," essentially a protest vote against the premier and his Thai Rak Thai Party, in addition to about 3 million more invalidated votes, setting another electoral record. Many of the latter group were invalidated by outraged citizens who scribbled "Thaksin Get Out" on their ballots.
Nonetheless Thaksin stressed that his party had received 16 million votes, and he owed it to these voters to stay on as prime minister.
Then, on Tuesday, the belligerent caretaker prime minister was granted an audience with Thai King Bhumibol Adulyadej at his palace in the seaside province of Hua Hin.
After that audience, Thaksin rushed back to Bangkok for another public message on public television on Tuesday night, to announce his decision not to accept a third term as prime minister, but to stay on as a caretaker while a new parliament and government is set up.
And, oh yes, he will stay on as head of the Thai Rak Thai Party, which -- when and if it ever manages to form a new parliament -- would likely hold at least 499 of the 500 seats, a percentage any communist state would be proud of.
Then on Wednesday, Thaksin made a dramatic show of leaving his office at Government House, removing the pictures of his beloved family and other personal items, shaking hands with his loyal aides and hugging and being hugged by his adoring supporters as he rode off home.
"He is a world-class spin doctor," said Sunai Pasuk, Thailand representative for Human Rights Watch, commenting on this week's performance. "It's just a tactical retreat from public pressure."
While Thaksin's "departure" from his executive powers, or at least his promise not to resume them in the future, has been generally welcomed by the people opposed to his rule, the substance of his grand exit has left more questions than answers.
Obviously, the three former opposition parties that boycotted Sunday's snap election to draw attention to the dictatorial powers Thaksin had amassed over his past five years as premier, were not impressed.
"We should not be alarmed or happy with his decision to step aside, because we have to see whether his regime is still around or not," said Chuan Leekpai, a former Thai premier himself and senior member of the main opposition Democrat Party.
The Democrats have always maintained that what is needed is a new round of political reforms, not another election. They are calling for constitutional amendments, designed to strengthen checks and balances on a populist regime like Thaksin's.
Thaksin, a former telecommunications tycoon who romped to power on a host of populist policies designed to win votes from the rural and urban poor, was Thailand's first billionaire premier.
While Thaksin has promised to set up an independent committee to mull such constitutional changes, it is doubtful that anything that might rein in his party's near-absolute rule will be approved by a parliament dominated by the party, with Thaksin at its head.
"He may be able to move Government House to the House of Representatives, where he will be sitting," joked Suchit Bunbongkarn, a well-respected political scientist at Chulalongkorn University who helped to draft the 1997 constitution.
Suchit said that amendments to the Constitution are needed to strengthen Thailand's independent bodies, such as the Constitutional Court and National Counter Corruption Committee, by removing politicians from the committees that nominate members to such bodies.
But such amendments are not likely to be approved by a parliament dominated by the Thai Rak Thai party.
The People's Alliance for Democracy, which led the mass demonstrations over the past two months demanding Thaksin's resignation, has also vowed to continue its struggle despite Thaksin's "departure."
Alliance leader Suriyasai Katasila told reporters that the group was to resume its anti-Thaksin protests yesterday.
"The anti-Thaksin movement has set two strategies: one is pressuring Mr Thaksin to step down, and the other is removing the Thaksin Rule. Mr Thaksin's stepping aside from office won't defuse a time-bomb, but merely delay the explosion," Suriyasai said.
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with
Historically, in Taiwan, and in present-day China, many people advocate the idea of a “great Chinese nation.” It is not worth arguing with extremists to say that the so-called “great Chinese nation” is a fabricated political myth rather than an academic term. Rather, they should read the following excerpt from Chinese writer Lin Yutang’s (林語堂) book My Country and My People: “It is also inevitable that I should offend many writers about China, especially my own countrymen and great patriots. These great patriots — I have nothing to do with them, for their god is not my god, and their patriotism is
RSS