Both during his visit to the US and in his meeting with President Chen Shui-bian (
If we agree that there is a Taiwan Strait crisis, then the external factors are Beijing's deployment of missiles threatening Taiwan and its wish to use its "one China" strategy to annex Taiwan. An internal factor is pro-unification propaganda in China-friendly media preventing the Taiwanese people from gaining an understanding of the nature of the regime in Beijing.
Two recent opinion polls have offered surprising results. In one poll, conducted by the Institute for National Policy Research 14 percent of respondents said they agreed that the People's Republic of China was a free and democratic country, while 20 percent answered that they didn't know. Added together, this suggests that one-third of Taiwanese don't know that China is a despotic dictatorship.
Of all the countries in the world, Taiwan should not be unaware of the nature of Communist China. There are no elections there, it is ruled through violence and it has deployed 800 ballistic missiles aimed at Taiwan along its eastern coast. In Taiwan with its press freedom, one-third of the population doesn't know that China is neither free nor democratic? This ignorance is preposterous.
In the other poll conducted by a media outlet after the Chen-Ma meeting, one-third of respondents said Beijing would agree to Ma's "one China, with each side having its own interpretation." This once again shows how many Taiwanese don't have a clue about the nature of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Anyone with a degree of political common sense knows that Beijing would never agree to Ma's "one China" interpretation, because that would mean acknowledging that there are two Chinas. China has never relaxed its interpretation of "one China," so why would it let this policy fall to pieces now?
The public's lack of understanding of China is mainly a result of pro-Chinese reporting in the pro-unification media in recent years, but, although worrying, it is understandable. Ma has joined those who lack this understanding. His statements during his US visit and his meeting with Chen were filled with wishful thinking, but he is deceiving no one but himself with his calls for "one China, with each side having its own interpretation."
Ma has also said that the KMT and the CCP have engaged in contacts over so many years that the KMT is able to get along with the CCP on any issue. I wonder if he understands the shamelessness of this statement. The reason the KMT continually lost out to the CCP and eventually had to flee to Taiwan was that it had no idea of how to deal with the CCP.
Prior to Lien's visit to China last year, he made a big issue of adhering to the non-existent "1992 consensus" and "one China, with each side having its own interpretation." While in China, however, he never even dared to mention the name "Republic of China," never mind "one China, with each side having its own interpretation." Apart from gaining a promise of two pandas during his "negotiations with the CPP," did Lien bring home anything substantive to Taiwan?
The CCP is not a dumb, cuddly panda. Anyone who wants to play word games with the CCP will be used by the party. Anyone who wants to befriend the CCP thinking that it is a sweet little panda must have the IQ of a panda.
Cao Changqing is a freelance journalist.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS