All of the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) worrying about the popularity of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Whatever else one wants to say about Ma, one cannot deny his skill in avoiding confrontations and ability to sell himself as a pragmatist. Whenever Ma is confronted with an issue, be it cross-strait policy or economic affairs, he backs away from ideological rhetoric and frames himself as a problem-solver.
In short, Ma is a consummate politician: He anticipates what people want to hear, and tells the public whatever keeps them satisfied.
The DPP has not shown itself to be particularly skilled in this regard, because whenever President Chen Shui-bian (
This would all be fine if most Taiwanese were die-hard independence supporters. But they are not. Despite the electoral gains that Chen made in the 2004 presidential election, there has not been a major shift in the ideological views of most Taiwanese.
Poll after poll has demonstrated that Taiwanese ultimately have a very realistic and pragmatic view about their country's relationship with China.
Taiwanese want to reap the benefits of China's growing economic clout. They want to enrich their own lives by using their industries not to make a political statement about the nation's status, but by making smart investments that will pay off in the future. For this reason, many businesspeople and investors see nothing inherently wrong with investing in China's booming economy.
This, in the end, is why the DPP need not worry about these businesspeople's fixation with China. The booming economy there will not last forever. Eventually, the rollercoaster ride will come to an end, and people will have to seek another form of amusement -- India and Southeast Asia, which the government has rightly identified as possible destinations for investors looking for the next best thing.
No matter where investors turn to once the aphrodisiac of China's economic growth starts to wear off, the point is that politicians here should take the longer view. Taiwan is not in the middle of an economic crisis, but in the throes of a political stalemate. The instability caused by these political troubles has -- and continues -- to cause problems for the nation's long-term economic outlook.
This country has inherited a deeply flawed political system rife with the vestiges of an authoritarian, one-party state. To move beyond the acrimonious impasse that now beleaguers it, Taiwan must depend on women and men of vision and leadership.
It does not need politicians who mouth platitudes and look good on television, such as Ma. He may be skilled at telling people what they want to hear, but can he deliver the ideas and difficult solutions that Taiwan needs to ensure that its democracy succeeds?
The DPP has recently gone on the offensive against Ma, saying he is all show and no substance.
This argument would carry more weight if the DPP showed itself to be a party of substantive ideas. Where are the pan-green leaders? Who in the DPP is ready to stand up and say something worth hearing, rather than just criticize their pan-blue counterparts?
There is still almost two years before the next presidential election. The time to take a stand is now.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS