These are troubling times for the EU's top policymakers. Competition from China and India is on the rise, jobs remain in short supply and outrage in many Muslim countries over the publication of caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed has strained Europe's once warm relations with the Islamic world.
But as EU leaders prepared for summit talks in Brussels on Thursday and yesterday, EU officials focused on another priority: halting the wave of economic protectionism sweeping across many countries in the 25-nation bloc.
Few can deny that Europe's single market is under its most serious threat since 1992, when governments boldly moved to abolish national frontiers, allowing the free movement of people, goods and services across the bloc.
illustration: mountain people
Concerns about a resurgence of economic nationalism center on Italian claims that the French government engineered a merger between state-controlled Gaz de France (GDF) and utilities group Suez to thwart a rival bid for the latter from Italian energy group Enel.
Other recent deals have also triggered concern in Brussels.
Madrid is currently studying ways to keep German energy giant E.ON from buying Spanish group Endesa. France, Luxembourg and Spain are exploring ways of keeping Mittal Steel from acquiring rival Arcelor, a deal they deeply oppose.
And EU policymakers are also entangled in an acrimonious struggle with Warsaw over Polish government moves to block the merger of Pekao and BPH, two local affiliates of the Italian banking group UniCredit.
Ringing the anti-protection alarm bells loudest is ardent free-marketeer Jose Manuel Barroso whose job as head of the commission -- the EU's executive arm -- puts him at the center of the economic storm raging across the bloc.
Barroso is set to warn the upcoming EU summit that government meddling in corporate takeover battles is not just threatening the EU's single market but also jeopardizing Europe's ability to compete on the global stage.
"This is not the time for economic nationalism ... in a globalized world, no member state can go it alone," the commission chief warned recently.
"Defending national champions in the short-term usually ends up relegating them to the second division in the long-term," Barroso cautioned, adding: "More efficient companies that have been subjected to the full rigor of competition leave national champions behind as they move into international markets."
Barroso appears to have found an ally in German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who said in a recent interview: "Above all, I am against walling off and protectionism."
EU anti-trust regulators, led by the bloc's competition chief Neelie Kroes, say they are determined to vet each energy merger and acquisition and will take legal action against governments and companies accused of breaching EU single market rules.
Even more is at stake, according to other EU commissioners.
EU monetary affairs chief Joaquin Almunia told the bloc's finance ministers recently that the protectionist furor is putting the bloc's fragile economic recovery at risk.
Energy experts say mergers in the sector will help consolidate the bloc's fragmented energy market, thereby lowering energy costs and boosting EU energy security.
European trade commissioner Peter Mandelson, for his part, has warned that "simplistic solutions of economic nationalism" are threatening the EU's global reputation as a defender of free markets.
It's not just about the economy or global standing, however. The debate has also triggered a damaging political rift among EU governments.
While French politicians often rage against the commission's "ultra liberal" policies, free-market Nordic nations and many central and eastern European states -- excluding Poland -- say the EU executive must take a tougher stance against nationalist rhetoric and policies.
The concern is shared by many in the European Parliament. Graham Watson MEP, leader of the assembly's liberal democrats, says the bloc's governments are on a slippery slope which could end up destroying the single market.
"The commission must remain vigilant and act forcefully ... to prevent member states from rolling back the progress in European integration that has brought Europe so far together," Watson cautions.
Stopping the protectionist tide will not be easy however. But EU officials say they are confident that if political pressure does not produce results, lawsuits and court action certainly will.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS