Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) should explain his stance on appropriate defenses for Taiwan in the face of the Chinese military threat.
In order to explain his party's stance in opposing the arms purchase from the US, Ma claimed that the part of the budget for Patriot missiles had been vetoed by a referendum two years ago. He also said that President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) recent decision to cease the function of the National Unification Council (NUC) has made the arms deal more complicated.
We would like to remind the public that two years ago the referendum was overwhelmingly supported, but failed to gain enough votes to be valid. The KMT, as well as Ma, encouraged their supporters not to vote in the referendum because they did not believe it was legitimate for Chen to introduce such a referendum. In short, the Patriot missiles were never an issue and were never vetoed.
Moreover, before Chen announced his intention to halt the NUC in January, Ma's KMT had blocked the arms purchase plan more than 40 times in the Legislative Yuan.
Although Ma and his KMT officials have stated that Taiwan needs to maintain an appropriate capacity for self-defense, they have yet to provide an alternative plan in the midst of China's military builup.
According to Ma, cross-strait relations are one of the factors his party will look at when deciding on the arms purchase.
However, in his interview with TVBS on Feb. 28, Ma said that he suggested the EU consider lifting the arms embargo on China during his recent visits to London and Brussels.
Ma and the KMT should clarify whether the so-called "appropriate defense" has anything to do with the ongoing Chinese military threat.
We also demand that Ma explain why he initiated the discussion of lifting the arms embargo on China in Europe, while in Taiwan his party has repeatedly blocked weapons purchases from the US.
Chang-cen Ho
President
European Federation of Taiwanese Associations (EFTA)
Brussels, Belgium
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
In competitive sports, the narrative surrounding transgender athletes is often clouded by misconceptions and prejudices. Critics sometimes accuse transgender athletes of “gaming the system” to gain an unfair advantage, perpetuating the stereotype that their participation undermines the integrity of competition. However, this perspective not only ignores the rigorous efforts transgender athletes invest to meet eligibility standards, but also devalues their personal and athletic achievements. Understanding the gap between these stereotypes and the reality of individual efforts requires a deeper examination of societal bias and the challenges transgender athletes face. One of the most pervasive arguments against the inclusion of transgender athletes
RSS