What is this new penchant of political leaders to make promises so florid that they carry with them a self-destruct mechanism if things go astray?
Premier Su Tseng-chang (
If Su is sincere about reducing crime, he has done himself no favors by committing himself to a result that relies on complex statistical analyses -- the trashing of which has become a pan-blue-camp specialty, regardless of the strength of the evidence -- as well as the public's perception via opinion polls that crime is falling. Worse, this perception is more a product of media manipulation and hyperbole than it is of personal experience of crime and social trends.
Tying the leadership of a Cabinet and the morale of its ministers to this standard is unnecessary -- and obstructive. Instead of putting pressure on Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Su's backers in the party must be hoping against hope that Minister of the Interior Lee Yi-yang (
Last year's local government elections were in part a test of the new party chairmen. Ma cleverly promised to step down if the pan-blue camp did not secure a certain number of city and county electorates. Ma was clever because the number he chose was modest under the circumstances. Su almost immediately followed with the same promise, brandishing a number so unrealistic that he was more or less forced to start considering his next career move there and then.
But at the time, it seemed that Su could step down as chairman of the DPP with honor. He simply did not have the time to fix the mess that he inherited, but his resignation gave the party a brief shot of dignity that someone could accept responsibility and take a fall.
Now Su has repeated this tactic. But this time he doesn't represent a party; he heads the Executive Yuan. It is a radical move at a time that the Cabinet requires strength, solidarity and confidence after years of instability and lack of momentum. For the sake of the government, Su would be better advised to never give up, never give in, never resign until all other options have been exhausted. Now that Su has floated the prospect of resignation after the shortest time possible in the job, DPP supporters who have seen their premiers come and go must be starting to get that sinking feeling again.
Meanwhile, the Mainlander-dominated criminal network Bamboo Union and other pro-KMT thugs must be rubbing their hands with barely suppressed glee. If Su is Ma's only credible challenger for the presidency, then here's an open invitation for them from Su himself to contribute to his possible removal from office by markedly increasing their criminal activity. Pro-DPP criminals, for their part, are hardly likely to wind back their operations and place limits on their livelihoods to indulge a politician's risky strategy.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS