President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) announcement to "cease" the National Unification Council and its guidelines highlighted the US' passiveness in promoting cross-strait dialogue. Since China passed its "Anti-Secession" Law and both former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan's (連戰) and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong's (宋楚瑜) China visits, Beijing's Taiwan policy has been to isolate and marginalize Chen's government. In response, the US has repeatedly expresses its hope that China can talk to Taiwan's elected leader. Verbal statements of this sort will hardly bring China back to the negotiating table.
Looked at from Chen's perspective, if Beijing refuses to speak to him directly, any compromise or concession will only make his power base more fragile. No rational decision-maker would act in this way. As a result, the deadlock between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait is expected to remain unchanged, and tension may even increase.
Clearly, Washington is the only one that can push Beijing to consider the restart of talks with Taipei. However, although Washington regards itself to be a facilitator to cross-strait talks, if it only advises Beijing orally, the effectiveness has been proven limited. From now on, Washington will need to take proactive moves to push Beijing into a dialogue with Taipei.
Chen's announcement has also underlined the necessity for the US to review its balancing role on the cross-strait issue. Washington has always defined the "status quo" in the Strait as "no independence, no war" -- based on the principle that no one shall change the "status quo" unilaterally. But its concern over the "independence" part of the equation has far outweighed its concern for "no war."
While the US and China both show concern over the perceived "gradual" or "creeping" shift towards de jure Taiwan independence, Washington has ignored the process of Beijing's "gradual annexation" or seeking of de jure unification. In the face of the growing military imbalance in the Strait, China's attempts to contain Taiwan's diplomatic space and marginalize Taiwan in regional economic cooperation, the US has failed to declare its position or counter China's threat.
US tolerance will only allow China to go further, pushing Taiwan toward being united by China or even annexed. If Taiwan does not fight back, then the "status quo" is likely to drift toward a situation unfavorable to Taiwan.
Therefore, since Washington has only had a minimal response to Beijing's "no war" pronouncements, Taipei deserves the right to draw a red line between itself and Beijing. The premise for Chen's declaration of the "four noes and one without" -- that the Chinese regime has no intention to use military force against Taiwan -- is not just a matter of principle. It must be taken as an operational concept that restricts and deters China's hostile moves against Taiwan.
The cessation of the unification council and guidelines is Taiwan's declaration to the international society: We will never tolerate China's irrational threats. In short, in order to secure peace and safety in the Strait, in addition to righting the military balance, we need to pursue political deterrence.
Taiwan must also strive for the right to define and judge the "status quo," while making its bottom line clear and give itself an unassailable position.
The NUC incident was finally ended by "one cessation, with each side making its own interpretation." Through this action, Taiwan has won the right to interpret the "status quo" and to interpret what constitutes a change to the "status quo." This may well be a turning point.
Lo Chih-cheng is the executive director of the Institute for National Policy Research.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS