While the US State Department continues to ask President Chen Shui-bian (
For the Chinese government, the cross-strait "status quo" means that Taiwan is a province of China, which is strongly opposed by most Taiwanese people. Because the unification council and guidelines also consider Taiwan a part of China, the decision to cease their function helps Taiwan escape from the trap of the "one China" principle. Meanwhile, this also means that it is the Taiwanese people, not the ruling elite, who have the ultimate right to decide Taiwan's future. Maintaining the status quo of Taiwan's democracy and freedom is the consensus of all Taiwanese people and it corresponds with US interests.
Needless to say, the Chinese government and the pan-blue camp were infuriated by Chen's decision. However, it seems that the US also believes Taiwan may change the status quo unilaterally. In fact, the US government seems to put much more pressure on Taiwan than China these days.
For example, the US hardly talks about China's growing military arsenal, nor the 14.7 percent increase in its military budget announced for this year. Does the US not regard this as a serious threat to the "status quo?"
If the US' idea of the "status quo" is different from that of China, namely, that Taiwan is a sovereign state instead of a part of the PRC, then the US government should clarify its interpretation unambiguously so as to avoid any misunderstanding among the main "players" on the Taiwan Strait's chessboard.
Su Yen-pin
Yonghe, Taipei County
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS