A recent study, the 228 Incident: A Report on Responsibility names the dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) as the prime culprit, giving the backing of academic research to something everyone already knew. It told us nothing new.
However, Chiang's grandson, John Chiang (蔣孝嚴), together with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), have offered as "counter-evidence" to this proposition the order Chiang Kai-shek gave to Chen Yi (陳儀), then Taiwan executive administrator, on March 13, 1947, which read, "Any retaliation on the part of military administration officials should be strictly prohibited, and anything to the contrary dealt with as acting against orders." This, they contend, is proof that Chiang Kai-shek was not the prime culprit.
One has to question why Chiang Kai-shek included the word "should." It reveals that Chen didn't prohibit anything, and that the "retaliation" was already in progress. This is why Chiang Kai-shek used that word. He meant that Chen should do something -- prohibit retaliation -- that in fact he hadn't done.
Chiang never made this order on his own. It was in response to the situation. On the date in question, March 13, Yang Liang-kung (楊亮公), who had been sent by the Control Yuan in China to monitor the situation in Taiwan, sent a message to Yu You-ren (于右任), then president of the Control Yuan, saying, "As the local government's random arrests have disquieted civilians, I would like to suggest that you forward a request to the central government that it give the local government strict orders to refrain from retaliatory measures."
Upon receiving Yang's message, Yu immediately sent him a reply, saying "I have reported to the chairman [Chiang Kai-shek] on what you saw there."
Before sending his reply to Yang, Yu informed Chiang Kai-shek, who immediately responded by issuing an order. That is, Chiang's order was issued as a show for the Control Yuan. However, such an order is inadequate to prove that Chiang is not the main culprit in the 228 Incident.
According to Denny Roy's Taiwan: A Political History, Chiang gave Chen two orders. One was made public while the other was not. The undisclosed one tells Chen to be tough and "slaughter them all in a secretive manner." The author's sources are listed in a footnote on page 71 of the book. This assumption should not come as a surprise, for this was Chiang Kai-shek's standard tactic. It is sufficient evidence that Chiang Kai-shek directed the suppression of the unrest.
Why was Chiang Kai-shek so determined to slaughter the Taiwanese? At the time of the 228 Incident, Chiang Kai-shek wrote in his diary that "Communists and ambitious politicians are instigating the public."
A look at the overall situation shows that in January 1947, the ceasefire agreement between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was broken, in February, the CCP launched a massive attack on Jilin Province and civil war seemed imminent. Chiang connected the incident in Taiwan with "communists" thus determining his view of the character of the 228 incident and setting the tone for how to deal with it. On March 10, Chiang wired Chen, asking him to remain in his post although Chen had already expressed his wish to resign to take responsibility for the incident. In the telegram, Chiang said "There are reports that the undercover communists in Taiwan gradually are coming into play. We should take strict pre-emptive measures to prevent this from happening and cannot leave a single cell to jeopardize the future."
Ko Yuan-fen (柯遠芬), then head of the Taiwan Garrison, said straight out that "there is no doubt that the communists are the masterminds behind this political conspiracy." He strictly enforced the idea of "rather unjustly killing 99 innocent as long as he could kill a true [communist]." This attitude completely tallied with Chiang's motive. No wonder Chiang was so ruthless, for the massacre resulting from the 228 Incident was a link in the civil war between the KMT and the CCP.
It was Chiang Kai-shek who directed the suppression of the unrest following from the 228 Incident. On May 7, he dispatched Liu Yu-ching (劉雨卿), the commander of the 21st Division, to travel to Taiwan to maintain order. Officially, Liu was under the command of Chen, but he was in fact taking orders directly from Chiang.
Authors Lai Tse-han (
Chiang only trusted his own henchmen, and he was the only one who could direct them. Liu was under Chiang's direct orders to quell the unrest in Taiwan and that is why he reported directly to Chiang. Pai only relayed Chiang's orders to Liu.
Over the years, more and more information about the 228 Incident has been revealed. The KMT cannot cover up the truth of whether or not Chiang was the main culprit behind the incident. The evidence will tell its story.
Chin Heng-wei is the editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Paul Cooper and Daniel Cheng
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS