The Recent suggestion by President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) that the time has come to seriously consider scrapping the National Unification Council and the Guidelines for National Unification has resulted in a fierce struggle between the two ends of the political spectrum.
Should the council and the guidelines be abolished? Yes, of course. The reason for this is that both the council and the guidelines aim to achieve a purpose -- eventual cross-strait "unification" -- that does not enjoy the support of the general public. Only those who favor unification with China would support retaining the council and the guidelines.
The purpose of this article is to warn the public of the danger posed by the Guidelines for National Unification, and to alert them to the existence of a second, "economic version" of these guidelines, which also needs to be abolished.
On Oct. 20, 2001, the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) National Congress passed a resolution on reorienting Taiwan's economic development. This incorporated the Economic Development Advisory Committee's (EDAC) "active opening, effective management" proposal.
This resolution has effectively become the DPP's party platform, and the government's administrative guidelines.
Although it does not specify issues of cross-strait economic integration, coexistence, or even future cross-strait unification, the content of the resolution more or less conforms with China's grand strategy of "promoting unification through economics."
As such, this policy effectively contributes to China's economic success -- at Taiwan's expense.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
When Chen put forward the revised "active management, effective opening" proposal in his New Year address, questions were raised as to whether this violated the guidelines.
But, in fact, the council and the guidelines are products of the then KMT government's one-party state, and do not serve the needs of the public. That Ma tried to use these illegitimate fabrications to defend his party's stance on cross-strait relations should serve to inspire all who love Taiwan to seek the immediate abolishment of the Guidelines for National Unification.
By the same token, the 2001 EDAC resolution was a collaborative "masterpiece" drawn up by pro-unification activists, scholars, government officials and China-based Taiwanese businesspeople. Its "consensus" was reached by a tiny percentage of Taiwan's population of 23 million. Therefore, this resolution should not be regarded as a party platform or even a national policy.
The policy of "active opening" has done great damage to Taiwan's economy. In excess of 40 percent of Taiwan's manufacturing now takes place abroad, mainly in China. In the manufacture of information technology products, the figure is 73.6 percent, and 100 percent for notebook computers.
Ninety percent of Taiwan's foreign investments are now in China. This has, in turn, hurt business in Taiwan's major commercial ports. Exports have fallen, damaging Taiwan's position as a transshipment hub. As a result, China's high-technology output is now the world's second largest. And no other nation is more dependent on China than Taiwan.
But the greatest damage has been caused by the legitimization of a course of action that is tantamount to financing our enemies. The policy of "active opening" creates the false impression that China is a benefactor, rather than an enemy, so that when former KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) "joined hands with China against Taiwan," the public response was one of apathy.
The policy was also responsible for the rout of the pan-green camp in the three-in-one local elections last December.
It is at the very heart of China's strategy to "promote unification through economics" and to "apply political pressure through commerce." As long as Taiwan persists with this flawed policy, the pro-China lobby will grow stronger and, ultimately, China will swallow this country whole.
Realizing the danger of the policy of "active opening," Chen has proposed "active management" as the country's new direction.
He must be allowed to take the next logical step and abolish the National Unification Council and the Guidelines for National Unification.
Otherwise, these anachronisms will lead Taiwan down the treacherous path to "unification" with China.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser to the president.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS