Although the Taiwanese government has yet to decide whether to accept China's offer of two giant pandas, Beijing has already named the pair "Tuan-tuan" (
Taiwan has been understandably hesitant over accepting the pandas. At a Council of Agriculture meeting last Friday, the majority of the experts attending believed that the pandas should not be removed from their natural habitat. The council will announce its decision on the pandas on April 3.
The problem does not lie with the pandas per se. They are adorable and hold considerable appeal to the Taiwanese public. The problem is the conditions imposed by Beijing. These pandas are also a souvenir of former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan's (
This is perfectly clear in the manner the gift is being made. By refusing to present the pandas officially to the government of Taiwan, China seems to be opting for the back door rather than the main gate. Taiwan has little option but to reject a gift given in this manner. If Taiwan accepts the gift of the pandas via an opposition party or private organization, this would set a capitulationist tone for cross-strait relations.
According to international conventions, exporting endangered species is prohibited. But from China's perspective, the matter is simple: If Taiwan is a part of China, export rules simply do not apply. Accepting the pandas would then be tantamount to telling the world that Taiwan accepts the "one China" principle.
If the pandas are nevertheless brought to Taiwan, they will certainly be given a warm welcome, with the public fighting for a glimpse of these creatures at an overcrowded zoo. But politically, the pandas' presence will be a black eye for Taiwan. This is something that the government cannot accept.
Whether the pandas take up residence in Taipei Zoo, Taichung's Takeng Zoo, or the Leofoo Village Theme Park, all are captive environments. They are not a natural habitat for pandas to live and breed in. For the pandas, moving to Taiwan would be a case of killing them with love.
China has lent its pandas to a number of US zoos as a symbol of goodwill. This led to a period of intense public interest in the animals. But now that the excitement has died down, the fees for the loan of the animals have become a burden. The New York Times recently reported that the Atlanta Zoo and three other US zoos are finding the annual US$2 million fees paid for the animals increasingly onerous. Feeding the animals their special diet is also a burden. As a result, the zoos said that they are considering returning the animals to China if they cannot reach some agreement on lowering the fees.
If the pandas are able to overcome the political obstacles that stand in their way, then the Taiwanese public will be able to enjoy the sight of these rare creatures. If not, everyone in Taiwan can still breathe a sigh of relief and wish the pandas a happy life in their natural habitat. There would be a valuable lesson to be learned from that: One does not have to possess something to be able to appreciate it.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS