You may be interested to know that your cartoon of Feb. 4 made it to a US Congressional hearing with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (on Thursday). We had given the cartoon to Congressman Steve Chabot, a Republican from Ohio, who made the following statement.
Gerrit van der Wees
Formosan Association for Public Affairs
Transcript of Representative Steve Chabot's comments to Condoleezza Rice at a Feb. 16 hearing:
In the time I've got left, let me just address one other issue -- cross-strait relations ... and our government's role in that area.
I've got a cartoon here which I believe came from the Taipei Times -- I'm sorry I don't have a better reproduction -- that shows a haggard looking fellow, labeled Taiwan, who is trying to extricate himself from a body of water because he is being approached by a shark, labeled China.
And he is being greeted by a rather large and menacing Uncle Sam, who appears to be holding a baseball bat. Uncle Sam is saying "Get back in there! We don't want to alter the status quo."
I use this cartoon as an illustration of the frustration I'm sure Taiwan's leaders must be feeling, and frankly, the frustration I am feeling.
It seems that every time Taiwan's democratically elected President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) opens his mouth, we read reports about consternation at the State Department and ominous quotes about Taiwan's attempts to change the status quo with its neighbor, the People's Republic of China (PRC).
Most recently, I understand that the State Department was gravely concerned about President Chen's decision to abolish the National Unification Council, a relic of the days when unification with China was advocated by the Taiwanese government.
Those days appear to be long gone. In fact, I'm told that the council has not met since 1999. It operated with an annual budget of US$31.
Thirty-one dollars. I think it might be a stretch to say it is a dangerous alteration of the status quo.
What I do think is a dangerous threat to the status quo is the ever-growing arms build-up in the PRC, especially the 784 missiles currently pointed at Taiwan -- a number which is increasing by around 100 per year.
That is a threat to the status quo. This increase comes after China's adoption of the so-called "Anti-Secession" Law, that, in effect, provides legal authority for China's leaders to invade democratic Taiwan. Another dangerous threat to the status quo, I would think.
Now, I will admit that I am not a big fan of our so-called "one China" policy.
I think it is wrongheaded and, frankly, dangerous, to pursue a policy that favors a dictatorship that continues to threaten war with Taiwan and has gained a reputation as one of the world's leading weapons proliferators.
Of course, I know the State Department position on "one China," but I wonder if the signals our diplomats are sending out to the world could be a little more balanced. Thank you, Madame Secretary.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS