Credit cards are relatively new in Taiwan. Thus, for many -- particularly the naive and inexperienced -- the ability to buy now and pay later is an attractive temptation.
The slow but steady accumulation of debt goes unnoticed amidst the immediate gratification of being able to enjoy consumable items. Eventually, of course, reality sets in and the piper must be paid.
That same naivete or expectation that the bill can always be passed on is evident in discussions on cross-strait relations. A friend recently made the comment: "Don't you think Taiwan would be stronger if we decided to join China? Think of all the jobs in Shanghai."
But everything has its price tag. The bullying threat of China's missiles coupled with the vision of a booming Shanghai seems to be like the offer of an unlimited credit card.
But, however rich Shanghai may appear and whatever opportunities it offers, it all comes at a price.
What price? I won't discuss the obvious and real loss of the values of democracy, a free press, freedom of speech, movement and religion.
These can be summed up with the saying, "You don't know what you've got until it's gone."
No, I want to simply look at more practical matters that touch the pocket book.
I will examine three in particular: the quality of health care, the quality of the environment and the most efficient use of tax dollars.
Overall, the quality of Taiwan's health care is excellent. Over 94 percent of the population is covered under the Bureau of National Health Insurance's (BNHI) scheme and costs are minimal compared to the US and most other countries.
So inexpensive is healthcare here that many Taiwanese living in the US readily bear the cost of a flight back to Taiwan to enjoy the inexpensive hospital costs.
With a growing budget deficit, the BNHI has reduced the number of reimbursable drugs covered under its plan.
The general populace naturally complained. But in actuality the cost per doctor's visit and prescription has only gone up by about US$5.
This is not an extreme burden but think of the costs if Taiwan had to share the gargantuan burden of providing the same standard of healthcare to the 1.3 billion people in China.
Second is environment. The quality of Taiwan's environment is far below the quality of its healthcare.
There is much to be done, and the cost of that will be high. Nevertheless there have been successes such as cleaning up Ai River in Kaohsiung. Look, however, across the Strait. Many of the world's most polluted cities are in China; likewise polluted rivers are in such abundance that even good drinking water is scarce.
If Taiwan finds it hard to put its money into cleaning up its own environmental problems, do the unificationists think they will get a free pass on the burden of cleaning up pollution in China? Who will pay the bill?
A third area is the effective use of tax dollars for the greater benefit of the country. Taiwan's education system is good but in need of continuous upgrading and improvement.
The chance to attend a university is becoming more and more available. When once there were only enough openings for less than 30 percent of the students who took the Joint Entrance Exam, now over 90 percent can find places.
In China a billion people do not have access to higher education. Who will foot that bill?
As for military expenditures, in Taiwan, the pan-blue dominated legislature has consistently rejected an arms bill on the grounds that such money should be used for more appropriate local projects.
Yet these same unificationists ironically promote joining a country that spends billions on its military (including the 700-plus missiles that it aims at Taiwan). Does the pan-blue camp think that Taiwan's taxpayers will get a free pass on the burden of that military buildup? Who will pay the bill?
Does anyone care to speculate on who would be sucked dry if a small prosperous country the size of Taiwan were taken over by a giant the size of China?
In the early 1990s, it became permissible and fashionable for Taiwanese nationals to go to China to visit family members. Many who took advantage of this returned to Taiwan disillusioned. They were welcomed in China, but soon they were besieged by the grasping hands of cousins they never imagined they had, all expecting gifts.
Put simply, if Taiwan faced a takeover by China (hostile or otherwise), whose pocket do you think the over 1 billion grasping hands would be reaching into?
Businessmen of course look only at immediate personal profit, and pan-blue unificationists wonder how they can profit from the takeover. But the bills will still have to be paid. They will mount with interest and always be passed on to the common man.
Credit-card companies offer free gifts to entice customers into their money pit. Once in, the naive find they struggle to make the monthly payments. High interest rates continue and the bills keep mounting.
Jerome Keating is a Taiwan-based writer.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS