People often argue that one should not mix politics with sports. For the longest time however, Taiwan has been victimized by China's bullying and its athletes forced to compete under the name "Chinese Taipei" at various international events thanks to the pact signed in 1981 between the then Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government and the International Olympic Committee.
While it is understandable that Taiwan needs to honor the pact and thus follow the rules set out in the agreement -- which stated that in return for being allowed to participate in international sporting events, sports teams must use the name "Chinese Taipei" and fly the "Chinese Taipei Olympic flag" -- it should be a different fight when it comes to non-Olympic events.
Taiwan, however, is still being forced to use the label "Chinese Taipei" in non-Olympic events such as the World Baseball Classic.
The upcoming Classic is neither an Olympic event nor an event held under the auspices of the UN. It is an international tournament featuring mayor league players. It will be staged for the first time next month, with the final game scheduled to be played in San Diego, California.
While the online encyclopedia Wikipedia deserves kudos for using Taiwan as the nation's title when listing the 16 participating teams, the World Baseball Classic's official Web site lists the national team under the name "Chinese Taipei," while China has listed the team under the name "China, Taipei" on its Web site.
China's vulgar act has drawn the ire of Taiwanese Web surfers. It should, however, remind all Taiwanese that they should refuse to be silent in the face of China's incessant coercion and oppression.
Since the 1981 pact condemned Taiwan to the name "Chinese Taipei," protests over the title at non-Olympic events have drawn rapid opposition from China and have led to accusations of "politicizing sports."
But who are the people of "Chinese Taipei"? This ghost does not exist on any map.
According to a survey conducted last year by the Government Information Office, a majority of people in the US, Japan and Germany view Taiwan as "Taiwan," not "Chinese Taipei," "China, Taipei," or "part of China" for that matter.
According to a recent poll conducted by the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times' sister newspaper), almost 60 percent of respondents viewed themselves as Taiwanese. Just 8.6 percent said they considered themselves to be Chinese.
Should Taiwan continue playing dumb and tolerating these indignities, it will appear increasingly natural for the international community and Taiwanese themselves to use this wretched title.
While Taiwan is bound for the moment by the 1981 pact, this does not mean that the nation should passively accept alternative titles at other international events.
All the affected government agencies -- from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the National Council on Physical Fitness and Sports -- should fight to increase Taiwan's visibility and win it respect in domestic and international settings.
If politicizing sports is what it takes to defend this nation's dignity, then so be it. Only the terminally naive could argue that "Chinese Taipei" does not represent an ongoing political insult.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS