Recently, the Institute for National Policy Research released a public opinion survey on the possibility of abolishing the unification guidelines. The results of the survey indicate that 51 percent of respondents do not support the idea that Taiwan must eventually unify with China, 68 percent said that it is necessary to review the feasibility of scrapping the doctrine aiming to achieve cross-strait unification, and that 78 percent said they agreed with the contention that Taiwan's future should be decided by its people. This is a reflection of mainstream public opinion.
President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) recent proposal to scrap the National Unification Council and unification guidelines came as a surprise to the US, especially as the US is now wrapped up in combating global terrorism and has relegated the cross-strait issue to the sidelines. However, the US should not adopt a passive attitude to the issue or even view Taiwan as a burden, but should rather use the issue to promote the idea of freedom to countries around the world. Aren't democratic elections in Iraq and the Taiwanese people's wish to decide their own future both examples of the values that the US is attempting to promulgate around the world?
The US still does not understand how to cope with China's "Anti-Secession" Law. The only thing that the US can do is to ask China to negotiate with Taiwan's democratically elected government. However, Beijing does not want to comply. China's growing military capabilities pose a threat to US interests. Chen's proposal to scrap the government agency and the doctrine, whose goal is the achievement of cross-strait unification, is the best way to deter China's ambitions. Surely then, he is working in favor of US interests.
Chen's recent proposal suggests that the government has begun to treat public opinion with the respect it deserves.
If Taiwan is to abandon the goal of cross-strait unification, it can be construed as a move toward democracy, for such a move will allow Taiwanese to decide their own future. If the US supports Taiwan's movement toward democracy, then it will help to bring about a change to China's brutal regime, boost global counter-terrorism efforts and even help to denuclearize the Korean peninsula.
Paul Lin is a writer based in the US.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS