Recently, the Institute for National Policy Research released a public opinion survey on the possibility of abolishing the unification guidelines. The results of the survey indicate that 51 percent of respondents do not support the idea that Taiwan must eventually unify with China, 68 percent said that it is necessary to review the feasibility of scrapping the doctrine aiming to achieve cross-strait unification, and that 78 percent said they agreed with the contention that Taiwan's future should be decided by its people. This is a reflection of mainstream public opinion.
President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) recent proposal to scrap the National Unification Council and unification guidelines came as a surprise to the US, especially as the US is now wrapped up in combating global terrorism and has relegated the cross-strait issue to the sidelines. However, the US should not adopt a passive attitude to the issue or even view Taiwan as a burden, but should rather use the issue to promote the idea of freedom to countries around the world. Aren't democratic elections in Iraq and the Taiwanese people's wish to decide their own future both examples of the values that the US is attempting to promulgate around the world?
The US still does not understand how to cope with China's "Anti-Secession" Law. The only thing that the US can do is to ask China to negotiate with Taiwan's democratically elected government. However, Beijing does not want to comply. China's growing military capabilities pose a threat to US interests. Chen's proposal to scrap the government agency and the doctrine, whose goal is the achievement of cross-strait unification, is the best way to deter China's ambitions. Surely then, he is working in favor of US interests.
Chen's recent proposal suggests that the government has begun to treat public opinion with the respect it deserves.
If Taiwan is to abandon the goal of cross-strait unification, it can be construed as a move toward democracy, for such a move will allow Taiwanese to decide their own future. If the US supports Taiwan's movement toward democracy, then it will help to bring about a change to China's brutal regime, boost global counter-terrorism efforts and even help to denuclearize the Korean peninsula.
Paul Lin is a writer based in the US.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS