The year 1626 was a turning point for the city we now know as New York. In that year, the director-general of the Dutch West India Co, Peter Minuit, "purchased" Manhattan Island from Native Americans for the now legendary price of 60 guilders. This formally began the colonization of New York, which the Dutch called New Amsterdam.
At that time, Dutch settlers did not take much of an interest in agriculture, and focused on the more lucrative fur trade. Corruption and lax trading policies plagued the area. In the 1630s and early 1640s, the Dutch director- generals carried on a brutal series of campaigns against the area's Native Americans, largely succeeding in crushing the strength of the "River Indians."
The year 1624 was a turning point for Taiwan. In that year, the director-general of the Dutch East India Co, Martinus Sonck, arrived in Tainan and began the colonization of Taiwan. At that time, Dutch settlers in Taiwan, like their counterparts in New York, focused on the lucrative trade in deer fur. An average of 150,000 deer skins were exported to Europe per year.
Among East India Co's 25 Asian locations, Taiwan was ranked second in profits, accounting for almost 4 tonnes of gold that was shipped back to its Amsterdam headquarters.
At that time, Dutch settlers of Taiwan, also like their counterparts in New York, killed many natives, notably in the 1635 massacre of 25 people in Ma-Do and the 1658 massacre of 250 people, most of whom were women.
Today, at the beginning of 2006, New York is no longer colonized and has become the world's financial and artistic center. The famous TV series Sex and City, which portrays life in New York, is viewed regularly by millions worldwide. Similarly, the Sept. 11 tragedy drew the sympathy of millions of people throughout the world.
New York's achievements would have been impossible without the courage and wisdom of the founding fathers of US, who famously wrote "we hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."
The founding fathers of US decided to stand up against Great Britain because of its "history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these States." Therefore, "the Representatives of the United States of America, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states, that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British crown, that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do."
Yet, for Taiwan, which has gone through colonization by the Dutch, the Qing Dynasty and Japan, this year is one of international obscurity. When President Chen Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) proposed using the name Taiwan to apply for UN membership, he was criticized by the US government.
Taiwan, which in 17th century shared the same fate of colonization with New York, has suffered more than the US over the last four centuries. Taiwan is now facing China, which has conducted massacres in Tibet, suppressed religions and groups such as the Falun Gong and aimed more than 800 missiles at Taiwan.
The brutality of China, which far exceeds that of 18th century Britain, is now gaining the support of the US government. What can be more absurd and tragic than this US government, which has betrayed its founding fathers?
Today, the people of Taiwan have as much right as the founding fathers of the US to fight for the independence of their country. The US government ought to change its shortsighted "one China" policy.
Taiwan in 2006, just like the US in 1776, deserves to be an independent country, and its people -- like the people of the US -- deserve to enjoy the rights of liberty and prosperity.
Bob Kuo is a professor of information systems at National Sun Yat-sen University.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS