The year 1626 was a turning point for the city we now know as New York. In that year, the director-general of the Dutch West India Co, Peter Minuit, "purchased" Manhattan Island from Native Americans for the now legendary price of 60 guilders. This formally began the colonization of New York, which the Dutch called New Amsterdam.
At that time, Dutch settlers did not take much of an interest in agriculture, and focused on the more lucrative fur trade. Corruption and lax trading policies plagued the area. In the 1630s and early 1640s, the Dutch director- generals carried on a brutal series of campaigns against the area's Native Americans, largely succeeding in crushing the strength of the "River Indians."
The year 1624 was a turning point for Taiwan. In that year, the director-general of the Dutch East India Co, Martinus Sonck, arrived in Tainan and began the colonization of Taiwan. At that time, Dutch settlers in Taiwan, like their counterparts in New York, focused on the lucrative trade in deer fur. An average of 150,000 deer skins were exported to Europe per year.
Among East India Co's 25 Asian locations, Taiwan was ranked second in profits, accounting for almost 4 tonnes of gold that was shipped back to its Amsterdam headquarters.
At that time, Dutch settlers of Taiwan, also like their counterparts in New York, killed many natives, notably in the 1635 massacre of 25 people in Ma-Do and the 1658 massacre of 250 people, most of whom were women.
Today, at the beginning of 2006, New York is no longer colonized and has become the world's financial and artistic center. The famous TV series Sex and City, which portrays life in New York, is viewed regularly by millions worldwide. Similarly, the Sept. 11 tragedy drew the sympathy of millions of people throughout the world.
New York's achievements would have been impossible without the courage and wisdom of the founding fathers of US, who famously wrote "we hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."
The founding fathers of US decided to stand up against Great Britain because of its "history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these States." Therefore, "the Representatives of the United States of America, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states, that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British crown, that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do."
Yet, for Taiwan, which has gone through colonization by the Dutch, the Qing Dynasty and Japan, this year is one of international obscurity. When President Chen Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) proposed using the name Taiwan to apply for UN membership, he was criticized by the US government.
Taiwan, which in 17th century shared the same fate of colonization with New York, has suffered more than the US over the last four centuries. Taiwan is now facing China, which has conducted massacres in Tibet, suppressed religions and groups such as the Falun Gong and aimed more than 800 missiles at Taiwan.
The brutality of China, which far exceeds that of 18th century Britain, is now gaining the support of the US government. What can be more absurd and tragic than this US government, which has betrayed its founding fathers?
Today, the people of Taiwan have as much right as the founding fathers of the US to fight for the independence of their country. The US government ought to change its shortsighted "one China" policy.
Taiwan in 2006, just like the US in 1776, deserves to be an independent country, and its people -- like the people of the US -- deserve to enjoy the rights of liberty and prosperity.
Bob Kuo is a professor of information systems at National Sun Yat-sen University.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS