A redefinition of the freedom of expression that incorporates "standardized" universally accepted religious taboos is becoming increasingly necessary in the light of the enormous row triggered by the controversial Danish cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed, prominent academics and media experts suggested on Thursday.
They contend that the caricatures, regarded throughout the Islamic world as blasphemous, had nothing to do with freedom of expression, but rather reflect a developed version of "Islamophobia" that started to gather momentum after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks in the US.
"There are religious axioms which are enshrined in the well-established international norms and conventions, and the Western world does know they should be respected," said Ibrahim Ezzedine, chairman of Jordan's state-run Higher Media Council.
"I believe it is high time for such taboos to be standardized in a clearer manner," he added. "The respect for divine ideologies should be given priority on human rights and personal freedoms which are unequivocally protected under international law and agreements."
Ezzedine, a former information minister, spoke as Arab and Islamic outrage over the cartoons threatened to blow up into new dimensions in Arab and Islamic countries, rejecting arguments by the governments of Denmark and other countries that the caricatures were published under the principle of freedom of expression.
He agreed that the publication of the cartoons reflected an "Islamophobia" on the part of some Western countries that sought to establish an across-the-board linkage between Islam and terrorism in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks in the US.
"They started to target political Islam and they are now turning their arsenal into the core Islamic ideology," Ezzeddine said.
Muslim masses are increasingly convinced that the caricatures, which were originally published in September by the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, were designed to give the impression that the prophet of Islam was a "terrorist."
One of the cartoons showed Mohammed wearing a turban in the shape of a bomb with a burning fuse. Another portrayed him with a bushy, gray beard wielding a sword, his eyes covered by a black rectangle. A third pictured a middle-aged prophet in the desert with a walking stick in front of a donkey and a sunset.
Islam bars any depiction of the prophet even respectful ones, out of concern that such images could lead to idolatry.
The cartoons were reprinted in January by the Norwegian magazine, Magazinet, while several papers in European and other countries volunteered to reprint them over the past week in what appeared to the Islamic world as a gesture of support for the Danish paper.
"They do not realize in the West that an absolute freedom of expression does not exist, and there are ethical controls that should be reckoned with," Taysir Abu Arja, professor of media at the Petra University, said.
"This is why newspapers in certain European countries, like Britain, have refrained from reprinting the caricatures and went further to criticize their publication by European papers," he said.
Abu Arja cited the confiscation of part of the press freedoms in the US by the administration of President George W. Bush for "serving its strategic targets in Iraq and elsewhere" as another evidence of the restricted freedom of press in Western countries.
"I believe freedom of expression should now be redefined so as to underline responsibility and ethics as key elements of a sophisticated press," he said.
Arja added that he was opposed to violent reactions in the Arab and Islamic countries to the cartoons and saw the remedy in starting a "rational dialogue" involving governments, parliaments and other institutions from the two sides.
"However, the ball is now in the court of Denmark and other concerned countries which must acknowledge [their] mistake first and try to correct it," he said.
Taher Adwan, chief editor of the daily newspaper Alarab Alyawm, viewed the solidarity expressed with Jyllands-Posten by a string of newspapers in countries extending from Europe to New Zealand as evidence of "hatred harbored against the world's 1.3 billion Muslims and their culture.
"The blasphemy against the Prophet Mohammed reflects an act of ethical deterioration that has nothing to do with the freedom of press, but rather reveals that Islam, as a religion, a culture and a civilization, is becoming a target for a dangerous attack under the pretexts either of reforms or the emancipation of women and now by printing these sacrilegious drawings," he said.
"Certainly, what some Western papers published does not represent the Western societies, but it reflects certain political objectives," he added.
Adwan expected the Vatican's condemnation of the publications of the prophet cartoons "will help to circumvent" the present turmoil.
"We also expect European civil society to step in to put an end to this defamation. Europe's politicians and media men should realize that the first step towards proper ties between the West and the Middle East lies in mutual respect and apologizing for the offense rather than adamantly going ahead with it," he said.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS