With vibrant economies and more than a billion people each, China and India might seem obvious candidates for the Group of Eight (G8), but analysts say the road to membership will be long.
Russia is now heading the G8 for the first time, inevitably triggering questions about why the two Asian giants have not joined long ago.
China must look on from the sidelines, although it has an economy that is roughly five times larger than Russia's.
A G8 finance ministers' meeting in Moscow on Friday and yesterday grouped Russia with what were once seen as the world's mightiest economies: the UK, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the US.
China officially became the world's fourth largest economy after recording GDP growth of 9.9 percent last year, and is a top priority for most nations when they look at their trade strategies.
Its official stance, repeated by local government-employed researchers, is a pronounced lack of interest in membership.
"It's not the right time for China to join," said Niu Jun (
Even so, China's views are shifting away from a traditional dismissal of the G8 as a rich man's club, according to observers.
This is partly because the current generation of leaders around Chinese President Hu Jintao (
But its entry into the WTO in late 2001, made possible only after opening its economy wider to foreign competition, may cause some renewed hesitation.
"China would now like to enjoy G8 member status but is wary of a new vehicle for concessions," said Jane Skanderup, an expert on the Asian political economy at the US-based Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Using membership as a bait, the G8 could try to pressure China on revaluing its currency or even on democratization, she said.
While not enthusiastically pursuing the G8, China actively seeks to promote other multilateral forums where it can shine more easily, according to Ralph Cossa, director of Honolulu-based think tank Pacific Forum CSIS.
"China attaches priority to new forums where it can increase its diplomatic profile, especially among its neighbors, and preferably when it is the biggest kid at the party," he said.
One instance of this is the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, which groups China with Russia and a cluster of small Central Asian republics, he said.
In contrast to China's lukewarm attitude toward the G8, India seems to be all in favor of membership.
"India would like to be part of the G8 if invited. But it's up to the G8 to decide on expanding the group and include whoever it wants," a senior New Delhi government official said.
That leaves the issue of what the G8 itself thinks about inviting a large, new country.
Russia's recent decision to use its energy exports as a political weapon against Ukraine may serve as a warning.
"Russia's energy shenanigans with the Ukraine has alerted G8 members to the hazards of prematurely extending membership to an `immature' democracy and economy," Skanderup said.
Cossa also said that the G8 is, in principle, a gathering of free-market democracies and China does not fall into either category.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS