When Jiang Zemin (
Since President Hu Jintao (
French President Jacques Chirac's popularity ratings plunged to below 40 percent after French voters rejected the EU's proposed constitution. Afterwards, a series of labor strikes and domestic riots orchestrated by French Muslims, as well as the issue of rising unemployment, diverted France's attention from Iraq's problems.
The Russian government appears to have softened its foreign policy stance. It is plagued by economic problems, concerned about the conflict in Chechnya and still dealing with the pro-Western Ukrainian government. The Russian government also ordered the construction of an oil pipeline from its huge Siberian oil fields to the Pacific Ocean opposite Japan, rather than into China -- a decision that has caused a rift between Moscow and Beijing.
The biggest change in Europe occurred in Germany last year, when former German chancellor Gerhard Schroeder stepped down after his party suffered a major defeat in parliamentary elections. Afterwards, right-wing Christian Democratic Union chairwoman Angela Merkel defeated other challengers for the chancellorship. Last week, Merkel went to the US and had a successful meeting with President George W. Bush.
Dubbed "Germany's Margaret Thatcher," Merkel pointed out during her trip to the US that "We are opening up a new chapter in US-German relations." Welt am Sonntag, a German newspaper, recently wrote in an editorial that "The departure of Schroeder will help German diplomacy move closer to the US, Poland and the UK at the expense of relations with France."
The likely strengthening of US-German relations under Merkel is going to have a great impact on the world, and will also dash Beijing's plan to have the EU lift its arms embargo against China. Both France and Germany had long been strong proponents of lifting the ban, but Merkel expressed her reluctance to carry out such a measure even before she took office. Her stance on this issue has helped ensure Taiwan's national security and dealt a blow to China's efforts to improve its image in the international community.
Merkel and Bush reportedly discussed how they are going to interact with China in the future, but no details have been made public. Nonetheless, Merkel did point out that "Germany and the US will jointly deal with countries such as China unwilling to obey any rules." This indicates that the US and Germany have reached an agreement on their China policy and intend to take a hard line on Beijing.
Although Hu paid a state visit to Germany last month, Merkel refused to discuss the arms embargo with him, and urged China to value the importance of freedom and practice the rule of law.
During her trip to the US, Merkel also stressed that the US and Germany should base their relations on counterterrorism. Although she did not clearly show her support for the US-led war in Iraq, her stance on this issue is clearly different from Schroeder's. Merkel also threw her weight behind the US decision to use the UN Security Council to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions. Seeing the US, the UK and Germany take a unified stance on this particular issue was unprecedented. France was therefore motivated to follow suit and consent to the idea.
As for Hu, he is faced with a conundrum. Iran is China's biggest oil supplier, and Beijing has always been a staunch supporter of Tehran. The US, UK, France, and Germany are taking a consistent stance on Iran's nuclear activities, making Beijing feel isolated.
In short, China has not been able to form an alliance with the EU to counterbalance the US -- a failure that will greatly reduce its influence on world affairs.
Cao Changqing is a Chinese dissident and writer based in the US.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS