The new Cabinet, led by incoming premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌), will officially take over tomorrow. Among the new Cabinet members that have been announced, vice premier Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and secretary-general Liu Yu-shan (劉玉山) have been a pleasant surprise. The pair's professional backgrounds, expertise and image has given the public high hopes for the new team.
The appointment of Tsai indicates that cross-strait relations will continue to be at the core of President Chen Shui-bian's (
Tsai is believed to have been the person who masterminded the "special state-to-state relationship" model used by former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) to describe cross-strait relations. She is known to have strong and committed views that do not easily succumb to external pressure -- even from Chen.
For example, approximately one month after Chen became president, he expressed an inclination to accept the so-called "1992 consensus," in which the sides agreed on the "one China" principle but retained their own interpretations of what that term meant. Tsai called a press conference the day after to deny that there had been any cross-strait "consensus." On the other hand, in the 2003 debates over adopting a new constitution and establishing a mechanism for referendums, Tsai backed Chen's policies all the way. Therefore, many believe that the Tsai's appointment means that the nation will continue its conservative approach to cross-strait affairs.
Tsai has a professional, academic and impartial image that makes her immensely popular with the general public. This is especially helpful to Chen's government, whose image took a nose-dive when scandals involving former presidential aide Chen Che-nan's (
The appointment of Liu is also refreshing, for two important reasons. Liu is no longer a member of any political party. He was previously a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) member, but did not renew his membership two years ago. His appointment reinforces the impression that the Chen government, and Su in particular, is willing to promote individuals based on their talent, even if they have to reach across party lines to do so. Liu served as the deputy secretary-general of the Cabinet in 1999, when the KMT was in power and Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) was the premier. He survived the change in ruling parties and five premiers. His expertise and familiarity with the Cabinet's affairs are unquestionable.
Now, for the sake of the Taiwanese people, Tsai, Liu and the rest of the new Cabinet must strive to fulfill the public's high expectations.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS