The victory of Socialist Michelle Bachelet in Chile's presidential election has reinforced Latin America's shift to the left.
Like Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, Brazil's Luiz Lula da Silva, Uruguay's Tabare Vasquez, Argentina's Nestor Kirchner and Bolivia's Evo Morales, the former paediatrician has also campaigned for the end to hardship for her country's poor, minorities and disadvantaged.
"Latin America is experiencing a rebellion against deprivation," said former Spanish prime minister Felipe Gonzalez, one of Bachelet's supporters.
But Bachelet, 54, who won 54 percent of the vote in Sunday's runoff election to become Chile's first woman president, represents a divergence from her ideological contemporaries in that she is no populist.
The former defense and health minister is calling for neither a political or economic revolution but a cultural one. She, therefore, is not distancing herself from her predecessors -- on the contrary.
"I am against the demonization of development in Latin America," Bachelet said. "There is no axis of evil here."
The region is not under threat from its democratically elected politicians, she said, "but from poverty, the lack of integration of its indigenous people, the drug trade and migration."
The Chilean political scientist Guillermo Holzman said he believes Bachelet, who is known as an "outside left" of the governing center-left coalition, will hardly touch the successful economic model and reforms of President Ricardo Lagos.
Chile has seen its gross domestic product grow about 6 percent annually in the past several years -- results seen by few countries in the world. It also saw US$7 billion in foreign investment last year, a substantial sum for a country of 15 million people.
In addition, its per-capita annual income of US$4,910 is 60 percent higher than the region's industrial giant, Brazil.
Despite these successes, 18 percent of Chileans continue to live below the poverty line, and the unemployment rate rose as high as 10 percent last year.
In addition, Chile has one of the world's 10 worst income disparities. The top 20 percent of the population own 56 percent of Chile's wealth while the bottom 20 percent account for 4 percent of its capital and income.
Lagos' projects targeting the poorest of Chile's citizens were timid. Bachelet -- considered the most leftist president since Salvador Allende, who was overthrown and died in the 1973 coup by General Augusto Pinochet -- is certain to expand them.
"With Bachelet, the candidate of the governing coalition indeed won," said Ricardo Nunez, president of the Socialist Party.
"But with her begins a new era with greater social justice, more rights for workers, pension reform and more and better education," he said.
Bachelet, with her sad family history -- her father was tortured to death under Pinochet's regime and she and her mother were jailed before fleeing into exile -- also is a symbol for many political analysts of Chile's rise from Pinochet's brutal 13-year military dictatorship as well as for the liberalization of Chile's ardently Catholic, archconservative and patriarchal society.
Divorce and advertising campaigns promoting the use of condoms were only introduced two years ago. Also new are the "cafes with legs," featuring waitresses in miniskirts, which was an unthinkable development only a few years ago.
"We are undergoing a cultural revolution," Professor Roberto Mendez said, adding that 10 years ago, Bachelet, a twice-divorced agnostic, would have stood no chance of winning the presidential vote.
But old beliefs and traditions die hard in Chile, and even though Bachelet's coalition will have a majority in both houses of Congress, which no other president in post-dictatorship Chile has had, the new president will not have an easy time of it.
"We are becoming another Spain, where homosexuals can now marry," said Ines, a primary schoolteacher in Santiago who had tears in her eyes after the election results were announced. God does not want such a thing, she said.
Taxi driver Alvaro, also a conservative Catholic, warned that Bachelet's fate would be the same as the founder of her Socialist Party.
"Mark my words, she will meet the same end as Salvador Allende," he predicted.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS