On Saturday, Chinese President Hu Jintao (
Taiwan's opposition parties immediately chimed in, saying that during the next legislative session they would put forward a cross-strait transportation bill to force the government to establish direct transportation links across the Taiwan Strait.
The real problem, however, is that Beijing will not talk to Taipei. The Taiwanese side expressed interest in this issue last year during semi-official negotiations on direct flights for the Lunar New Year holiday. It is China that has been unwilling to talk to Taiwanese representatives, and it has created further obstacles by insisting that freight links be preceded by passenger links.
Yet, despite all of China's manifest obstruction, local business and political interests continue to concoct nonsense about Taiwan dragging its feet.
China's cross-strait policy has stalled the development of relations between the two sides for five years, a situation that has attracted criticism from both pro-unification and pro-independence supporters. Now, following President Chen Shui-bian (
The policy aims to place Taiwan in the context of an increasingly integrated world economy as well as avoiding excessive investment in China. While it is difficult to change the distribution of markets overnight, Taiwan does have good choices available if it wishes to seek new production centers. Vietnam, India and South American nations are all ideal.
Recently, the EU moved closer to imposing anti-dumping duties on shoe imports from China. Problems like this will continue to arise as China's low-priced products are sent around the world. If the Taiwanese business community in China does not take measures to diversify investment now, it will suffer losses in future.
The pan-blue camp wrongly criticizes the idea of "active management, effective opening" as amounting to "closing the country to international intercourse." Taiwan is not shutting the door on China on the economic front but seeking a better way of regulating cross-strait commerce.
As long as the government effectively regulates how Taiwanese businesspeople invest in China, the nation will not neglect the Chinese market; indeed, it will be able to adopt a more progressive strategy.
The main cause of problems in the cross-strait relationship arise from the enmity that China feels toward Taiwan. This attitude has forced Taiwan to adopt an extremely wary posture out of a simple need to protect its national security. After all, it is China that has 700 or so missiles targeting this country, and backed this up with the enactment of the "Anti-Secession" Law. Only the foolish or defeatists can ignore this threat and shirk the responsibility of defending against it.
Taiwanese businesses based in China and the international community have to realize that the obstacles impeding direct links do not originate in Taipei, but in Beijing. It is to that quarter that the disgruntled should direct their pressure.
If Hu were genuinely interested in pursuing direct links, then he would approach the issue with a more open mind and make himself more accessible to delegations from this country. Until that happens, the impasse will remain.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS