The last face on earth that condemned men see as they are strapped on to the gurney for their execution by lethal injection in the death chambers of the prisons in US southern states is often that of a diminutive, grey-haired Catholic nun. She gazes into their eyes for as long as she can, trying to give them strength and show human compassion for their last few minutes.
It is a vocation that has made Sister Helen Prejean famous, especially since her story was dramatized 10 years ago in the film Dead Man Walking, in which she was played by Susan Sarandon, who has become her friend. It has also made her one of the doughtiest, most outspoken and maybe most formidable opponents of the death penalty in the US.
She has attended the execution of men she knows to be guilty of horrific crimes, but also of men she believes to be innocent, and prays with and counsels their families and those of victims. She believes that executions are morally wrong but the killing of the innocent, subjected often to a callous and stubborn judicial refusal over years properly to reinvestigate their cases after conviction, fills her with revulsion.
Prejean, 66, who could have opted for a quieter life as a teacher, makes herself attend and to be with men she has often befriended over several years. As their spiritual adviser, she can stay after their relatives have been escorted away, acting as the last friend they have:
"I go there to be there for them," she said. "When they look in my face they see someone who cares about them and believes in their dignity. They know that I will tell their story. You have to steel yourself to be utterly thinking of them. It is afterwards that you vomit."
In London to publicize her book The Death of Innocents, which details the cases of two men she believes were wrongfully executed, the Louisiana-based nun insisted that politicians' rhetoric is moderating and that the number of death penalty convictions is in decline. Public uneasiness about wrongful convictions and the manifest inequity with which the death penalty is implemented is growing.
Prejean said: "John Kerry was the first presidential candidate in 30 years to say he was against the death penalty and George Bush never made anything of it politically. In New Jersey they have just agreed a moratorium on the death penalty which the governor has said he will sign, and since 2001 across the country the number of death sentences has halved."
Prejean is scathing about politicians and judges who use the Bible to justify executions: "I call it Christianity-lite. It's not real Christianity. Truly, it is blasphemy. Jesus Christ is being held hostage by these people: his whole message is being perverted."
The cases in the book are those of Dobie Williams, a black man with learning difficulties, executed in 1999 for the murder of a white woman in Louisiana in 1985, and Joseph O'Dell, a white man killed in 1997 in Virginia for murdering and raping a white woman whose body was found near a bar he had visited one night 12 years earlier. It sets out cogent reasons for their innocence, or at least grounds on which the state and court authorities should have reconsidered their convictions.
O'Dell was executed despite an appeal by the pope for clemency, and despite the refusal of the state's governor to let the execution be delayed to allow DNA testing of some of the evidence.
She is now involved with another case in Louisiana: that of Manuel Ortiz from El Salvador, convicted in what she believes was a corrupt trial for hiring a hit man to murder his wife.
The book points out that only 2 percent of annual murder convictions result in the death penalty but says 80 percent of executions are in the south. More than 40 percent of death row inhabitants are black. Texas alone carried out 39 percent of all executions since the punishment was reinstated nearly 30 years ago.
The book is fiercely critical of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, a Catholic who claims to be obeying biblical injunctions and the intentions of the 18th-century framers of the Constitution.
Prejean has little more hope for Bush's appointments to the Supreme Court -- John Roberts, also a Catholic, and current nominee Samuel Alito.
"They come out of the same George Bush cookie cutter. They have a certain ideology and it is not one that will be on the side of standing up for people's rights. They are right-wing authoritarians," she said. "These people put on five pairs of white gloves when they are considering death penalty cases. They do not see the people they are dealing with as human. That's how Auschwitz happened."
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS