A recent comment by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
In a discussion concerning cross-strait flights Ma stated, "But the government just can't figure out its policy priorities, and it pushes for constitutional re-engineering when what people want is a better economy" ("Ma backtracks on referendum proposal," Jan. 7, page 3). Without even addressing the glaring inconsistencies in Ma's position on the referendum issue, it is important to note the danger embodied in his statement.
Ma only states the obvious here; of course the people of Taiwan want a better economy. Yet a better economy is not all the people of Taiwan want.
The people of Taiwan also want further democratic development, a more efficient and effective government and political stability -- all things that can best be achieved through the development of a new constitution.
The original Republic of China Constitution was not written for Taiwan, and the legal and institutional structures it created present numerous problems when it comes to governing Taiwan. The Constitution was ignored for decades as the KMT attempted to consolidate its power through military force and martial law.
In the post-martial law era the constitutional reform or amendment process has been conducted inefficiently, with an eye on preserving the existing power structure. This has led to the creation of a confusing document that precludes efficient governance.
These constitutional problems must be addressed to ensure lasting political stability in Taiwan.
Without political stability Taiwan cannot have the better economy that Ma mentions.
Unfortunately Ma's statement is in line with decades of KMT policy that sacrifice the long-term well-being of the people for the party's short-term political interests. Since the party's founding and rule in China during the early 20th century, through its takeover of Taiwan and up through the 2004 presidential election, the KMT has sacrificed political reform that would have led to long-term stability in order to protect its power.
For example, the KMT's economic policies, which promoted rapid growth, also had a devastating impact on Taiwan's environment.
Due to its fear of any opposition, the KMT government implemented harsh laws during the martial law era that prevented some of the best and brightest Taiwanese minds from contributing to national development.
While the KMT has reformed in recent years, its strong conservatism and desire to hold onto power still prevent the party from taking more courageous steps toward political reform.
To now imply that constitutional reengineering must be ignored in order to focus on improving the economy once again highlights the party's short-sightedness. It is not clear to me why having a better economy and political reform are mutually exclusive.
Clearly Ma is not saying that we should return to the martial law era, during which the KMT outlawed political reform because it claimed reform would threaten economic growth.
And of course Ma must understand that the current constitutional structure leads to a government that harms the economy due to its inefficiency.
I know that Ma is an extremely intelligent and educated man who is well aware that the line between politics and economics is very fine indeed.
So I am very surprised that he chooses to ignore the connection between constitutional reform and governmental efficiency and their impact on economic growth and progress for the people of Taiwan.
Constitutional reform is always a complex issue, and in the case of Taiwan it is made particularly complex by Taiwan's unique international situation.
Yet it is clear that political reform is essential for long-term political stability and economic growth.
Thus, Taiwan needs constitutional reform, and constitutional reform in Taiwan will require courageous and farsighted leadership.
At the present time Ma is not the right person to lead the way because he seems to lack the will to push for needed reforms and appears more concerned with short-term economic gain than the long-term political stability of Taiwan.
Of course the KMT is a powerful force and its participation in substantive political reform will be beneficial for everyone in Taiwan.
Therefore, I hope that in his role as KMT Chairman, Ma will exhibit stronger leadership and give greater attention to the dramatic need for constitutional change and political reform in Taiwan.
Don Rodgers
Texas
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS