I find the pan-blue camp's refusal to support the arms package quite disturbing for a number of reasons. First, it sends the wrong message to China and the US. To China it says that Taiwan is not interested in maintaining strong air and naval defenses. This amounts to a de facto policy of appeasement.
Such a policy will only embolden China and indeed, should re-unification occur, it will do so increasingly on Beijing's terms and not Taiwan's.
To the US the message reinforces the "status quo" of national indecision. Is Taiwan a real country or merely a "rebel province" masquerading as a country?
Given the domestic and Chinese criticism that the Bush administration received when it first offered the package in 2001, I find it alarming and bizarre that Taiwan cannot make a decision to accept or reject the proposal.
Indeed, the Bush offer was a policy reversal from the Clinton years. Should Taiwan find a Democrat in the White House in 2009, I would not be surprised if the present offer is withdrawn with no substitutes.
Furthermore, the pan-blue camp's criticism that the weapons are overpriced and aren't state-of-the-art -- and therefore should be "given" to Taiwan -- is ridiculous and demonstrates the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) limited scope of thinking.
Should the US, by this logic, simply "hand out" our latest cutting edge weapons to Canada, Japan, Britain and whomever else we deem to be our "friend," such a policy would not receive one vote in the US Congress.
Personally, I do not see how the US government, whose first obligation is the defense of US territory and its citizens, could even sell the latest weapons to a military that today is Taiwanese but tomorrow could be China's.
To do so would be irresponsible. It will not happen.
The fact remains that the weapons package is aimed at adequately protecting Taiwan's naval and air theaters of operation, both of which are absolutely paramount in successfully repelling a Chinese attack.
The package also gives Taiwan more time -- albeit very limited time -- to do what needs to be done: declare Taiwan a real, independent republic and acknowledge the People's Republic of China as the real China.
Martin Mitchell
Department of Geography, Minnesota State University
It is employment pass renewal season in Singapore, and the new regime is dominating the conversation at after-work cocktails on Fridays. From September, overseas employees on a work visa would need to fulfill the city-state’s new points-based system, and earn a minimum salary threshold to stay in their jobs. While this mirrors what happens in other countries, it risks turning foreign companies away, and could tarnish the nation’s image as a global business hub. The program was announced in 2022 in a bid to promote fair hiring practices. Points are awarded for how a candidate’s salary compares with local peers, along
China last month enacted legislation to punish —including with the death penalty — “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists.” The country’s leaders, including Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), need to be reminded about what the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has said and done in the past. They should think about whether those historical figures were also die-hard advocates of Taiwanese independence. The Taiwanese Communist Party was established in the Shanghai French Concession in April 1928, with a political charter that included the slogans “Long live the independence of the Taiwanese people” and “Establish a republic of Taiwan.” The CCP sent a representative, Peng
Japan and the Philippines on Monday signed a defense agreement that would facilitate joint drills between them. The pact was made “as both face an increasingly assertive China,” and is in line with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr’s “effort to forge security alliances to bolster the Philippine military’s limited ability to defend its territorial interests in the South China Sea,” The Associated Press (AP) said. The pact also comes on the heels of comments by former US deputy national security adviser Matt Pottinger, who said at a forum on Tuesday last week that China’s recent aggression toward the Philippines in
The Ministry of National Defense on Tuesday announced that the military would hold its annual Han Kuang exercises from July 22 to 26. Military officers said the exercises would feature unscripted war games, and a decentralized command and control structure. This year’s exercises underline the recent reforms in Taiwan’s military as it transitions from a top-down command structure to one where autonomy is pushed down to the front lines to improve decisionmaking and adaptability. Militaries around the world have been observing and studying Russia’s war in Ukraine. They have seen that the Ukrainian military has been much quicker to adapt to