For the last two days we have discussed President Chen Shui-bian's (
Everyone can talk the talk, but the real question is: Can Chen walk the walk?
The situation, hopefully, will not degenerate into something similar to what inspired former president Lee Teng-hui (
By all means, kudos should be extended to Chen for his reiteration of the principle of sovereignty, the DPP's core values and adopting a more aggressive position on cross-strait economic policy (albeit with cumbersome slogans): moving from an "active opening, effective management" approach to "active management, effective opening."
People are no fools, however. No matter how eloquent or grating a politician's speech may be, the public knows all too well what games are being played.
Rather than indulging in flowery word games and coining catchy slogans to get their supporters' blood racing, what Taiwanese really care about is what the government can do to ensure that they can maintain a better standard of living.
What a struggling father of three in some remote countryside cares about is whether he will have enough money in his account to pay for his kids' tuition in the coming semester. What a working single mom cares about is whether she can count on arriving home safely after doing her night shift at a factory.
In other words, practical stuff. What about the new pension plan that Chen spoke of before the local government elections, which he pledged would replace the 18 percent preferential interest rate that he said had been unfairly benefiting retired teachers, military personnel and civil servants? Who knows?
Then there are other social issues, such as the growing suicide rate among young people, which could do with a bit more conspicuous attention. The impression that the average person receives, however, is that, more often than not, government officials and lawmakers would rather appear busy locking horns than solving real problems.
The power awarded to political representatives by the people is not a plaything for fame or license to engage in a bitter war of words or to court media deference in the next day's papers.
Social issues, as minor as any single issue may seem, are what touch people's hearts, earn the government respect and therefore earn this nation respect as a democratic country.
While policies relating to cross-strait relations, economics, defense and foreign affairs are critical and have a direct bearing on national security, the "little things" can add up in a surprisingly damaging way for those politicians who neglect them.
As another year begins, this country is surely looking forward to a government that can attend to not only the bigger picture but also -- through more substantial acts involving subtle problems -- start reconnecting and touching people's hearts.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS