President Chen Shui-bian's (
Although many predicted that Chen would relax his China policy following the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) defeat in last year's local government elections, his cross-strait economic policy has only changed from "active opening, effective management" to "active management, effective opening."
This has led many to feel that the government was going to tighten its cross-strait policy and, as a result, the TAIEX fell 86.28 points on Monday. However, the nation's stock market rebounded yesterday with foreign investors helping the TAIEX to rise by 129 points on a staggering turnover of NT$153.4 billion (US$4.7 billion) -- more than counterbalancing the fall of the previous day, and refuting the pessimism of Chen's critics. In fact, changes in cross-strait policy are minor adjustments that will have little impact on Taiwan's longer-term economic prospects.
Rather than dissect the significance of the new wording, it is more useful to see how the new policy will be achieved. What Chen proposed in his speech is aimed at remedying the failings of current policy, for in the past, the government has not effectively regulated investments in China.
This has led to events such as chipmaker United Microelectronics Corp investing illegally in China and many firms investing through offshore companies or failing to honor loans made to finance their China investments. It is this situation that the government should rectify.
The key point of future policy lies in whether the government can establish a mechanism to control the process and discipline of cross-strait economic and commercial liberalization. If it is able to do so, then it can control the direction of this liberalization and even impose limits if necessary. It will also be able to use this mechanism to overcome disadvantageous circumstances that it may encounter.
The government is considering commissioning both local and foreign accounting firms to investigate the finances of Taiwanese firms operating in China so as to achieve greater control over their investments through a more detailed understanding of their financial situation, technological capability and human resources. This will enable the government to guide Taiwanese businesses in their investments in China and protect the interests of Taiwan's investors. This is a good way of correcting the current undirected flood of investment into China.
No policy is permanent. It has already been seen that "active opening, effective management" has led to capital outflows and has failed to gain any gratitude from China, which continues to ignore Taiwan's existence and rejects official dialogue on direct links and protection of Taiwan's interests in China. To continue with this policy will only lead to the further decline and marginalization of Taiwan. With the change in policy, the government will be able to look at cross-strait interaction from the perspective of Taiwan's interests.
Chen's determination to put Taiwan first is the correct policy to pursue and he should be supported. If he has failed in anything, then surely it is that he realized too late the failings of the previous policy, and for this Taiwan has paid a heavy price. Now, Taiwan must wait and see what can be achieved under the new policy of "active management, effective opening."
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS