President Chen Shui-bian's (
Although many predicted that Chen would relax his China policy following the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) defeat in last year's local government elections, his cross-strait economic policy has only changed from "active opening, effective management" to "active management, effective opening."
This has led many to feel that the government was going to tighten its cross-strait policy and, as a result, the TAIEX fell 86.28 points on Monday. However, the nation's stock market rebounded yesterday with foreign investors helping the TAIEX to rise by 129 points on a staggering turnover of NT$153.4 billion (US$4.7 billion) -- more than counterbalancing the fall of the previous day, and refuting the pessimism of Chen's critics. In fact, changes in cross-strait policy are minor adjustments that will have little impact on Taiwan's longer-term economic prospects.
Rather than dissect the significance of the new wording, it is more useful to see how the new policy will be achieved. What Chen proposed in his speech is aimed at remedying the failings of current policy, for in the past, the government has not effectively regulated investments in China.
This has led to events such as chipmaker United Microelectronics Corp investing illegally in China and many firms investing through offshore companies or failing to honor loans made to finance their China investments. It is this situation that the government should rectify.
The key point of future policy lies in whether the government can establish a mechanism to control the process and discipline of cross-strait economic and commercial liberalization. If it is able to do so, then it can control the direction of this liberalization and even impose limits if necessary. It will also be able to use this mechanism to overcome disadvantageous circumstances that it may encounter.
The government is considering commissioning both local and foreign accounting firms to investigate the finances of Taiwanese firms operating in China so as to achieve greater control over their investments through a more detailed understanding of their financial situation, technological capability and human resources. This will enable the government to guide Taiwanese businesses in their investments in China and protect the interests of Taiwan's investors. This is a good way of correcting the current undirected flood of investment into China.
No policy is permanent. It has already been seen that "active opening, effective management" has led to capital outflows and has failed to gain any gratitude from China, which continues to ignore Taiwan's existence and rejects official dialogue on direct links and protection of Taiwan's interests in China. To continue with this policy will only lead to the further decline and marginalization of Taiwan. With the change in policy, the government will be able to look at cross-strait interaction from the perspective of Taiwan's interests.
Chen's determination to put Taiwan first is the correct policy to pursue and he should be supported. If he has failed in anything, then surely it is that he realized too late the failings of the previous policy, and for this Taiwan has paid a heavy price. Now, Taiwan must wait and see what can be achieved under the new policy of "active management, effective opening."
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS