The issue of political parties and the military withdrawing from local media ownership is as old as the nation's democratic movement. But we must return to this old topic because, despite a transfer in executive power, media interference has not been dealt with.
If the problem is allowed to spread, the media will become a needless source of confrontation rather than a force for justice that speaks for the public. Foreign interests may also seize the chance to manipulate the nation's domestic affairs, weakening the national fabric, worsening cross-party tensions and bringing about the dissolution of the community into which the Taiwanese have invested so much emotion and determination.
If political forces do not withdraw from management of the media, the Fourth Estate -- the pillar that supports a modern democratic and civil society -- will not be able to fully exercise its function of monitoring the government. The media may also regress into a plaything of a select few, manipulated to deceive the public, create confrontation and attack those with dissenting views. Many existing outlets did these very things during the martial-law era when they helped the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) oppress their own people. Such shameful history cannot be allowed to repeat itself.
Unfortunately, the problem has not been rooted out. It remains a malign presence that can make itself felt at any time. The opposition majority in the Legislative Yuan has repeatedly blocked a draft law relating to the public ownership of terrestrial TV stations. The Ministry of National Defense has also failed to ask the Liming Cultural Enterprise Foundation -- in which it has a guiding hand -- to divest itself of shares in the Chinese Television System (CTS).
Now that CTS is under the management of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government, its managers have stated that they see it as their duty to turn the station into a pan-green outlet that can balance the control the pan-blue camp has over other channels. This confusion of values shows just how incapable the government and the opposition are in hiding their ambitions to control the media.
With the nation's media so politicized, there is little legal basis for opposing political interference, and loopholes are constantly exploited. It is through these loopholes that China has found a way into the domestic market, buying up traditional and electronic media under the guise of foreign capital and producing programs via local agents. In this way Beijing exerts a divisive influence on Taiwanese society and uses "authoritative sources" to expose dealings within the DPP.
The government and the opposition should be aware of the dangers of political influence in the media and work unselfishly to establish legislation to prevent this. If not, foreign powers and their local hired guns will make use of this nation's environment of free speech to attack their enemies, and the government will be powerless to respond.
Even the National Communications Commission will be unable to improve the situation when it becomes operational.
In April 1989, publisher Cheng Nan-jung (
Politicians would do well to reflect on that sacrifice and work to remove political skulduggery from media operations and prevent foreign interests from influencing domestic politics. Only then can democracy in Taiwan have real substance.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS