When Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma used the traditional ploy of saying that the arms procurement budget was a mug's game. After former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
If arms procurement is a mug's game, then clearly there must be a hustler who hopes to cheat the mug out of his hard-earned dollars. Who, in Ma's estimation, is the hustler? As the arms are being bought from the US, perhaps Ma will say that Taiwan is being hustled by US arms dealers. But an arms deal at such a high level and on such a vast scale must clearly involve the US government, so is Ma also pointing his finger at the US government? But if the US government is no more than a hustler, then how has Taiwan survived this long? Where would the glow on Ma's own Harvard halo be? Surely Ma cannot forget his bonds of loyalty in order to toady up to China?
Looking at Ma's attitude to the communists in China, we see that he is mild in his criticisms, calling them "undemocratic" rather than a "one-party state." On the recent massacre in Shanwei, Ma has avoided making any comment, so as not to offend China. Moreover, in recent interviews with the press, he has even suggested that "Beijing is in no hurry to achieve reunification" as a way of undermining Taiwan's psychological defenses, and as another means of obstructing the arms procurement bill.
If Beijing is in no hurry, then what is the purpose of its various ploys that are part of its "united front" strategy, including having the KMT propose inviting the chief of China's Taiwan Affairs Office Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) and other "united front" officials to Taiwan? In obstructing the arms procurement act, Ma is falling in line with Beijing's plans to "liberate" Taiwan and create the conditions for yet another 228 Incident. That's why his actions in relation to the 228 Incident are so clearly hypocritical.
Can arms procurement be a mug's game? Certainly it can. The Lafayette case is a perfect example. Not only did KMT officials cooperating with China obtain vast kickbacks that drove the price of the weapons up to astronomical levels, but France also passed on all the secret blueprints to China. Why did the prospect that the information would be declassified and sent to Taiwan make Ma so nervous?
Let us hope that Ma and Wang can compromise for the sake of the country and allow the arms procurement budget to pass. The government and the military have already made numerous concessions to this end. Surely Ma does not want to risk creating an irreparable rift with the US merely in order to continue the cooperation between the KMT and China.
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS