When Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma used the traditional ploy of saying that the arms procurement budget was a mug's game. After former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
If arms procurement is a mug's game, then clearly there must be a hustler who hopes to cheat the mug out of his hard-earned dollars. Who, in Ma's estimation, is the hustler? As the arms are being bought from the US, perhaps Ma will say that Taiwan is being hustled by US arms dealers. But an arms deal at such a high level and on such a vast scale must clearly involve the US government, so is Ma also pointing his finger at the US government? But if the US government is no more than a hustler, then how has Taiwan survived this long? Where would the glow on Ma's own Harvard halo be? Surely Ma cannot forget his bonds of loyalty in order to toady up to China?
Looking at Ma's attitude to the communists in China, we see that he is mild in his criticisms, calling them "undemocratic" rather than a "one-party state." On the recent massacre in Shanwei, Ma has avoided making any comment, so as not to offend China. Moreover, in recent interviews with the press, he has even suggested that "Beijing is in no hurry to achieve reunification" as a way of undermining Taiwan's psychological defenses, and as another means of obstructing the arms procurement bill.
If Beijing is in no hurry, then what is the purpose of its various ploys that are part of its "united front" strategy, including having the KMT propose inviting the chief of China's Taiwan Affairs Office Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) and other "united front" officials to Taiwan? In obstructing the arms procurement act, Ma is falling in line with Beijing's plans to "liberate" Taiwan and create the conditions for yet another 228 Incident. That's why his actions in relation to the 228 Incident are so clearly hypocritical.
Can arms procurement be a mug's game? Certainly it can. The Lafayette case is a perfect example. Not only did KMT officials cooperating with China obtain vast kickbacks that drove the price of the weapons up to astronomical levels, but France also passed on all the secret blueprints to China. Why did the prospect that the information would be declassified and sent to Taiwan make Ma so nervous?
Let us hope that Ma and Wang can compromise for the sake of the country and allow the arms procurement budget to pass. The government and the military have already made numerous concessions to this end. Surely Ma does not want to risk creating an irreparable rift with the US merely in order to continue the cooperation between the KMT and China.
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS