In the mid-1950s, Chinese authorities suppressed the "Hu Feng counter-revolutionary clique" composed of members of the then Chinese literary and art scene, and Mao Zedong (
The naked truth of this statement was once again revealed prior to this year's world celebration of Human Rights Day on Dec. 10. At least 10 residents of Dongzhou Township in Guangdong Province, who participated in a protest against corruption, pollution and land seizures, were shot dead by riot police. There have been reports quoting villagers as saying that there were even tanks or armored vehicles patrolling the scene, a situation similar to what followed the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre.
It was unusual that the New York Times gave this incident a front-page headline saying that China's riots were getting worse. It could also be said that Beijing is also gradually losing its grip on the nation, for not only is it unable to control protests, it has shown itself unable to restrain rampant exploitation by local interest groups, including looting and killing.
Between August and September, there was a different riot incident instigated by villagers from Guangdong's Taishi Village. Although this incident was given positive coverage by the state-controlled media, it still resulted in repression by the local government, which colluded with local gangs. As a result, even lawyers and other professionals showing concern over this incident were reported by the international media to have been kidnapped or assaulted.
Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
No matter what the truth of the matter is, the hypocrisy of "people-based" governance, as proclaimed by Chinese President Hu Jintao (
Repression against human rights protests will just get further out of hand, with the result that lives will be lost as in last week's incident in Guangdong.
In order to safeguard their own interests, privileged groups in China will get rid of people either directly or indirectly. The two incidents already mentioned are examples of the former, while man-made disasters -- such as mining disasters (which are so frequent they kill an average of 16 people each day), explosions in chemical factories (primarily caused by ignoring safety in a drive toward higher profits) -- are examples of the latter.
The Mainland Affairs Council and the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy have censured China for the recent massacres. In this way, they highlight Taiwan's effectiveness as a democratic nation.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), which has joined hands with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), should show more concern for the misfortune of the Chinese people. I look forward to what the pro-China KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS