"Grow up!" is the sort of thing you would say to a college student who was whining about missing his favorite TV program.
It's hard to imagine that you would need to say such a thing to the leaders of a country.
But as funny, or as sad, as it may sound, this is the exact phrase that comes to mind in light of the unseemly exchanges between President Chen Shui-bian (
Having accepted the nomination as interim party chairperson during a regular meeting of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Central Standing Committee last Wednesday, Lu abruptly announced her decision to resign from the post in a press release on Monday night.
While the row over the acting chairmanship seems to have abated somewhat as a result of Lu's decision yesterday to withdraw her resignation and accept her party comrades' calls for her to stay on in the post, the incident has led to much interest in the relationship between the president and the vice president.
It has been speculated that Lu initially decided to quit as interim party chairperson in response to a media report which claimed that the president had Jao Yung-ching (
The cancelation of a routine meeting between Chen and Lu on Monday added to the speculation that the president was not in favor of Lu's decision to accept the position.
Saying that she had been willing to "endure all sorts of scathing criticism" since taking up the interim post because she had wanted to "bolster the battered party after the just-concluded elections," Lu in her Monday statement noted that she had decided to quit because she saw party reform as "a distant and elusive goal" and did not wish to make herself a sacrifice on "the altar of struggle" between various party factions.
Subsequently, Chen, in a statement issued late on Tuesday night addressing the turmoil that resulted from Lu's abrupt resignation the day before, stressed that he would not tolerate rumors suggesting that he was trying to control the party's decision-making process on major party affairs.
Apart from her very public differences with Chen, Lu's conduct since assuming the interim post has been quite refreshing as her positive demeanor has shown that the electoral defeat is not the end of the world for the party and she has done much to alleviate the gloomy atmosphere that had lingered over the DPP since election day.
In defense of Chen and Lu's unseemly behavior, it must be remembered that politicians, and even presidents, are human, and susceptible to emotions and weaknesses such as anger, jealousy and over-excitement.
However, as the Greek poet Alcaeus once said, "Language exerts hidden power, like a moon on the tides."
The nation's top two leaders might keep this ancient wisdom in mind if they want to avoid allowing their public rhetoric to turn the DPP's internal turmoil into a soap opera for the entertainment of the party's critics.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS