"Grow up!" is the sort of thing you would say to a college student who was whining about missing his favorite TV program.
It's hard to imagine that you would need to say such a thing to the leaders of a country.
But as funny, or as sad, as it may sound, this is the exact phrase that comes to mind in light of the unseemly exchanges between President Chen Shui-bian (
Having accepted the nomination as interim party chairperson during a regular meeting of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Central Standing Committee last Wednesday, Lu abruptly announced her decision to resign from the post in a press release on Monday night.
While the row over the acting chairmanship seems to have abated somewhat as a result of Lu's decision yesterday to withdraw her resignation and accept her party comrades' calls for her to stay on in the post, the incident has led to much interest in the relationship between the president and the vice president.
It has been speculated that Lu initially decided to quit as interim party chairperson in response to a media report which claimed that the president had Jao Yung-ching (
The cancelation of a routine meeting between Chen and Lu on Monday added to the speculation that the president was not in favor of Lu's decision to accept the position.
Saying that she had been willing to "endure all sorts of scathing criticism" since taking up the interim post because she had wanted to "bolster the battered party after the just-concluded elections," Lu in her Monday statement noted that she had decided to quit because she saw party reform as "a distant and elusive goal" and did not wish to make herself a sacrifice on "the altar of struggle" between various party factions.
Subsequently, Chen, in a statement issued late on Tuesday night addressing the turmoil that resulted from Lu's abrupt resignation the day before, stressed that he would not tolerate rumors suggesting that he was trying to control the party's decision-making process on major party affairs.
Apart from her very public differences with Chen, Lu's conduct since assuming the interim post has been quite refreshing as her positive demeanor has shown that the electoral defeat is not the end of the world for the party and she has done much to alleviate the gloomy atmosphere that had lingered over the DPP since election day.
In defense of Chen and Lu's unseemly behavior, it must be remembered that politicians, and even presidents, are human, and susceptible to emotions and weaknesses such as anger, jealousy and over-excitement.
However, as the Greek poet Alcaeus once said, "Language exerts hidden power, like a moon on the tides."
The nation's top two leaders might keep this ancient wisdom in mind if they want to avoid allowing their public rhetoric to turn the DPP's internal turmoil into a soap opera for the entertainment of the party's critics.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS