Even foreign companies are now getting embroiled in the local elections, with the pan-blue camp quoting a recent report by Merrill Lynch. The report stated that if the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) fails to win a majority of the county seats, the market will react positively. It went on to explain that a defeat would force them to rethink cross-strait policy. Global Views Monthly also quoted Guy Wittich, chief executive officer of the European Chamber of Commerce, Taipei (ECCT) as saying that it was looking less and less likely Taiwan could become a transit hub for the Asia-Pacific region, an opinion trumpeted by pro-unification factions.
Taiwanese businesspeople want the government to relax regulations and allow them free rein to invest in China, and foreign investors would like to use Taiwan as a springboard into China, using the island when the need is there, and getting out the moment they no longer need it.
So can Taiwan become a transit hub? Far be it from me to throw cold water on the idea, but in recent years Taiwanese ports have seen a drop in the volume of cargo handled, with Kaohsiung falling in global rankings from third place to sixth last year, falling behind other Asian ports such as Shanghai, Shenzhen and Busan, South Korea.
Please, though, do not lay the blame at the feet of the government for holding back on direct flights -- if anyone should take responsibility here, it is those businesspeople who have relocated production to China.
Since production lines have been moved across the Strait there is little cargo left in Taiwan to handle, and with little cargo to handle, cargo ships are not likely to stop here, making instead for Shanghai and Shenzhen to pick up cargo produced there by Taiwanese businesses. Air freight was also hit badly following the move of high-tech manufacturing to China. It really has little to do with direct flights.
Having said that, we should also feel sorry for these foreign investors. This year qualified foreign institutional investors have poured more money into Taiwan's stock market than that of any other Asian country save Japan.
This money, however, cannot make up for losses made due to Taiwanese businesses setting up in China. At present the weighted share price index of the TAIEX is wavering around the 6,200 mark, and for the time being there is no light on the horizon.
Foreign investors are, after all, businesspeople, and the reason they are investing so heavily in Taiwan's stock market is that they want the value of their stocks to increase. They are hoping the government will do something to stimulate the stock market so they can pull out without making a loss. They are putting their hopes in direct flights and a relaxation in the government's current cross-strait policy, which explains Merrill Lynch's report.
The thing is, what businesspeople want is not always in the national interest. According to a government commissioned report, direct flights could save businesses between NT$14 billion and NT$20 billion in transportation costs annually.
However, it would also mean an almost two-fold increase in investment in China (worth around NT$320 billion), which would mean the economy would shrink. Taiwan would also be even less attractive as a transit or distribution center, and if one also takes into account the impact this will have on public security and national defense, it is clear the balance tips against Taiwan.
We could say that the Merrill Lynch report and the comments from ECCT are misinformed, but we cannot blame them, for they are looking at the situation from a Western perspective. The ones we should be blaming are the pro-unification factions who choose to exploit these for their own political interests.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS