While domestic attention has again been focused on local politics and elections rather than international affairs, a closer look at the recent triangular goings on between Washington, Taipei and Beijing reveals an urgent need for President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) administration to reinforce its ties with the US.
US President George W. Bush wrapped up his Asian tour last week by strengthening the US' partnership with Japan and by continuing its dialogue with the Chinese government on several contentious issues.
Before visiting China, Bush promoted his "expansion of democracy" theory in Kyoto by lauding South Korea and Taiwan as models of economic liberalization turned political democracy. Bush held up Taiwan as a model for China's leaders to follow.
There is no doubt that the US and Taiwan share the universal values of democracy, freedom and human rights. But when it comes to the question of how to strike a balance between the growth of Taiwan's democratic consciousness and Washington's attempts to build a "candid, constructive and cooperative" partnership with China, it seems only the national interests of the US prevail. Even the "alliance of values" between Washington and Taipei can sometimes become distorted.
This was illustrated by the down-turn in US-Taiwan relations two years ago when a huge lack of understanding and trust occurred over Chen's advancement of a referendum. While Washington kept pressuring Chen to refrain from provoking China, the US failed to constrain Beijing's expansion of the missiles targeted at Taiwan and its diplomatic saber rattling and constriction of Taipei's international space.
Nevertheless, since Chen and Bush won re-election, relations have entered a renewed stage of mutual understanding and frank communication.
The Bush government's call for Beijing's leadership to engage in dialogue with Chen after former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)chairman Lien Chan (
Therefore, Bush's recent statement presents a window of opportunity for the government to consolidate a sustainable partnership with the US.
The lack of intimate interaction between Bush and his Chinese counterpart, Hu Jintao (
One should not overlook the possible change of Chinese mindset as Beijing probably has its eyes on the next change of leadership in both Taiwan and the US. Until 2008, passive interaction with Taiwan and the US may become a central principle of Beijing's policy.
If this is the case, Washington may have difficulties in terms of introducing its model of "economy first, democracy later" to China. Such a theory also ignores the potential dangers associated with Beijing's continued military build-up and aggrandizement. The Chinese people's consciousness of "century-old humiliation" is often be used by Beijing authorities as a tool for stirring nationalist sentiment.
Most importantly, it is hard to force an authoritarian China to introduce democracy without inviting military resistance, especially if Beijing fails to control the People's Liberation Army.
Under such a geopolitical landscape, the Bush administration should really contemplate the degree to which Washington can keep a balance between safeguarding its own national interests and dealing with an undemocratic China while keeping a fully-fledged democratic Taiwan safe from China's military expansion.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS