The "three-in-one" local government elections will soon be upon us, and with the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) reeling from recent scandals, and trouble stirred up by the press and unscrupulous opposition politicians, things are getting tense. Some pan-green supporters and swing voters don't consider these elections to be important. This, together with voter apathy induced by the government's poor record and disillusionment over recent scandals, means DPP voters are more likely to stay away from the polls to punish the party.
This is dangerous. If the DPP does badly in these polls we could see the collapse of democracy and freedom in Taiwan. This is not mere scare-mongering.
First, in this election the Taiwanese are up against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). When former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (連戰) agreed to join forces with the CCP in order to suppress Taiwanese independence, he was effectively joining ranks with the bandits and hooligans working against Taiwan.
But how exactly are they going to achieve this? Through elections. If the pan-blues win, they will be in a better position to help the CCP control Taiwan through legal means. From what we have seen of the oppressive and callous way Beijing treats its own people, there is little doubt that this will only lead to the loss of Taiwan's democracy and freedom.
Second, some believe that things have changed now that Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Third, despite the seeming lack of importance of these elections, the central government needs the support of local governments, especially when it is facing an opposition which has a majority in the legislature. If local governments come under the control of the pro-China factions, it will spell disaster for the pan-green camp in the next legislative and presidential elections.
Fourth, the CCP's tentacles are already finding their way into grassroots Taiwanese society. They invited many county and city councilors to China to discuss imports of Taiwanese agricultural products, only to allegedly offer them bribes. This is just one example.
At the moment the pan-blues are pulling out all the stops to do well in these elections, creating scandals and inciting rumors. Rumors of homosexuality among party members have been used to court sympathy, Lee Teng-hui was hit with a NT$10 million (US$298,000) fine for defamation, and a raid of a private residence seized VCDs critical of the KMT and brought the maker in for questioning.
Trying to quash the voice of anyone who doesn't happen to agree with you smacks of the CCP. It is known as "white terror." Do you see those individuals making noises about "green terror" being dragged in for questioning by the DPP? If they are given even the slightest amount of power on the local government level they will do everything they can not only to reinstate the KMT as lords of the party-state system, but to work with Beijing to bring a new era of "red terror" to Taiwan.
I would suggest that Taiwan's voters, irrespective of whether they support the pan-green or pan-blue camp, think carefully about whether they want this.
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS