The crisis in Harbin and surrounding areas linked by the Songhua River, the result of a series of explosions at a petrochemical plant earlier this month, highlights two things.
First, in this global village, what one does in one's home can never be one's own business, because neighbors could very well end up paying a hefty price. In this case, Russia is the unlucky neighbor, forced to call a state of emergency for Khabarovsk as the benzene slick floats downriver toward that region.
Second, Chinese officialdom still hasn't learned that honesty and transparency are the best policies in the face of health and environmental hazards or crises.
The explosion at the plant took place on Nov. 13. At the time, there had been speculation on the potential polluting of the Songhua River, but provincial officials refused to come clean on the issue until almost two weeks later. They kept the general public in the dark about a situation that was always going to have an immediate and longer-term impact on water supplies, as well as on the surrounding environment.
Worse still, when the Harbin government announced its decision to shut off the city's water for four days, it flatly denied that it had anything to do with the pollution and insisted that it was being done for other reasons.
Nothing is more agonizing than knowing that something has gone seriously wrong without knowing exactly what it is. This was the predicament faced by Harbin's residents. Most suspected that the shut-down of their water supplies had something to do with pollution caused by the explosion -- Chinese aren't stupid, though their government may think so -- yet, for days, the government could not bring itself to tell them the truth.
In democratic societies, when governments try to sweep dirt under the rug and are found out, they face dire consequences at the hands of both their constituents and an independent legal system.
Unfortunately, in countries such as China, a government can repeatedly lie through its teeth precisely because it does not have to worry about subsequent sanctions.
In the long run, however, behavior of this nature can still cause an autocratic government damage in terms of domestic credibility and its international reputation. And this latter consideration is where the Chinese government can be hit right where it hurts. After all, it is Beijing's aim to become a respectable regional and even world leader. A questionable record on fundamental issues such as protecting the livelihoods of the citizenry and the infrastructure that attracts overseas investors will become a major roadblock on the path to world leadership.
With this latest mishandling of misfortune, it is impossible not to be reminded of China's track record in dealing with the SARS outbreak and the avian flu. At the height of the SARS scare, Beijing chose to stay silent on the extent of the outbreak at home. Had it told the truth in a timely fashion, Taiwan and Hong Kong might have been able to better prepare their campaigns against the disease -- and the number of casualties may have been significantly reduced.
In the wake of the outbreak of bird flu in the region, the Chinese government -- which insists it learned its lesson after the SARS saga -- continues to provoke skepticism over whether it is capable of passing on the facts in a time of emergency. The Songhua River incident can therefore only foster grave doubts about the way Beijing will deal with what experts say is an inevitable bird flu epidemic.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS