From what we have seen of the campaigning for the Dec. 3 local government elections so far, it seems it has been little more than a string of dirty tactics. Previously, the most controversial issue was which party stood for Taiwan and which for China. In this election the focus has been on mud-slinging: The process was started by the pan-blues, but the pan-greens soon got in on the act, getting down to the same level. The Taiwan-China debate has moved on to which party is the most corrupt, and it is this that the electorate is taking most into consideration.
Pan-blue legislators have ganged up with sympathizers within the media (especially at TVBS) and the prosecutorial system and stepped into the fray armed with the Kaohsiung Rapid Transit Corp (KRTC) scandal, accusing the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) of corruption.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said it all when he announced that "The DPP, after five years in government, is even more corrupt than the KMT." Of course, in saying this, he is also admitting that the KMT is corrupt.
Let's examine the claim that the DPP is corrupt. Ever since the DPP came to power in 2000, the pan-blues have launched wave after wave of attacks on President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), using the influence on the media they acquired during the days of the party-state system. They finally struck gold with the KRTC scandal.
Now that it looks like former deputy secretary-general to the Presidential Office Chen Che-nan (
To be honest, this is exactly what the pan-blues have been looking for in their relentless attacks on Chen Shui-bian. The DPP has been knocked reeling, and is finding it difficult to parry the blows. Nevertheless, it is possible that the pan-blues have gone too far, especially in their attempts to implicate Chao Yu-chu (
Some DPP members took a false step in proposing the "new DPP movement," for although the party should remain committed to reform, the process should not be driven by bait set by the opposition.
If the DPP is to turn things around and drag itself back out of the mud in this fracas, it will have to go on the offensive, and start revealing instances of corruption within the KMT.
The most obvious are the 18 percent preferential interest rate for retired public servants, military personnel and teachers; Taichung Mayor Jason Hu's (
Probably one-quarter of the KMT's nominees at city and county level have been accused of some form of corruption. It is interesting to contemplate how its strategy may prove ineffectual, or even backfire, because the KMT's "sacred mission" to reveal corruption in government may only serve to draw attention to its own less than perfect track record on this score.
Since the pan-blues don't understand themselves and don't understand others, this policy is likely to backfire, and they will only succeed in digging their own grave.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Paul Cooper and Ian Bartholomew
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS