The transformation from dictatorship less than two decades ago to today's democracy was the first surprise Taiwan gave the US.
Taiwan might now deliver a second surprise to the Americans by recovering from the growing pains its adolescent democracy is experiencing.
It's worth noting that these growing pains were brought on in large part by the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) exploitation of the US' "one China" policy in its quest for unification. It comes as no surprise that Taiwan could do with some change to the policy to ease unificationist pressure.
Nevertheless, whatever interest there is in the US in tweaking the "one China" policy would have to be backed by enormous local pro-sovereignty sentiment to have a reasonable chance of success.
Yet this is where Taiwan can give the US that second surprise: The pan-green camp could win the next legislative and presidential elections.
This would come about because the alternative would only lead to a fate unacceptable to most Taiwanese.
To be sure, this time around, the odds against Taiwanese producing this result may seem greater because the pan-blue camp and the Chinese Communist Party have formed a working relationship to oppose Taiwan's sovereignty and democracy.
One of this alliance's most dangerous maneuvers is the cross-strait peace advancement bill. It is in effect an attempt at initiating de facto unification while bypassing formal cross-strait negotiation. It's also a diabolical plot to rob the Taiwanese people of the right to informed consent in deciding the future of the country. Pan-blue legislators are, in effect, openly assaulting Taiwan's democracy.
The pan-blue leaders' unilateral disarmament effort -- as exemplified by the repeated blocking of the special arms-procurement bill and the pro-China media's daily use of propaganda and rumors -- also amounts to an attempt at debilitating Taiwan's physical and psychological defenses.
This three-pronged maneuver encompasses legislation, unilateral disarmament and propaganda, and is intended at crippling the US Taiwan Relations Act, in addition to crushing the Taiwanese people's confidence in the survival of their democracy. In turn, the alliance seems to believe this will ensure the pan-blue camp's victory in the next elections.
But the Taiwanese people can make sure that what actually unfolds will not follow that script.
For instance, the eagerness of the People First Party (PFP) to please its Beijing handlers by proposing the cross-strait peace advancement bill is placing KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
For Ma, this bill is better left untouched until after the next presidential election. Taking up the bill at this time forces him to show his cards earlier than he would prefer.
What had been envisaged as a Trojan horse therefore looks increasingly likely to be a bill that will blow up in pan-blue leaders' faces instead.
Conversely, the bill might be a blessing in disguise for the pan-green camp, given that it is revealing the blueprint on how a 2008 pan-blue president would conduct cross-strait affairs. It could therefore evolve into issues around which the Taiwanese people can rally against Ma and the KMT.
Should the pan-green camp prevail in the elections for 2008, the Taiwanese people will have proclaimed anew their preference for democracy and sovereignty over collective autocracy and "unification."
This renewed commitment would have profound implications internationally. The global community of democratic states would have to take this democracy seriously. Most importantly, Taiwan would have earned the respect of its two closest allies -- the US and Japan.
Gone would be Taiwan's image of being the weakest link in the chain of democracies in the western Pacific needed by the US to impede the spread of China's despotic capitalism.
Gone would be government backtracking -- under misguided US pressure -- on changing the national title and constitutional overhaul, matters of paramount importance to the continuing flourishing of Taiwan's democracy.
It is imperative, therefore, that the pan-green camp perform well in next month's elections, which are a warm-up for the big elections in a few years.
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS