The transformation from dictatorship less than two decades ago to today's democracy was the first surprise Taiwan gave the US.
Taiwan might now deliver a second surprise to the Americans by recovering from the growing pains its adolescent democracy is experiencing.
It's worth noting that these growing pains were brought on in large part by the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) exploitation of the US' "one China" policy in its quest for unification. It comes as no surprise that Taiwan could do with some change to the policy to ease unificationist pressure.
Nevertheless, whatever interest there is in the US in tweaking the "one China" policy would have to be backed by enormous local pro-sovereignty sentiment to have a reasonable chance of success.
Yet this is where Taiwan can give the US that second surprise: The pan-green camp could win the next legislative and presidential elections.
This would come about because the alternative would only lead to a fate unacceptable to most Taiwanese.
To be sure, this time around, the odds against Taiwanese producing this result may seem greater because the pan-blue camp and the Chinese Communist Party have formed a working relationship to oppose Taiwan's sovereignty and democracy.
One of this alliance's most dangerous maneuvers is the cross-strait peace advancement bill. It is in effect an attempt at initiating de facto unification while bypassing formal cross-strait negotiation. It's also a diabolical plot to rob the Taiwanese people of the right to informed consent in deciding the future of the country. Pan-blue legislators are, in effect, openly assaulting Taiwan's democracy.
The pan-blue leaders' unilateral disarmament effort -- as exemplified by the repeated blocking of the special arms-procurement bill and the pro-China media's daily use of propaganda and rumors -- also amounts to an attempt at debilitating Taiwan's physical and psychological defenses.
This three-pronged maneuver encompasses legislation, unilateral disarmament and propaganda, and is intended at crippling the US Taiwan Relations Act, in addition to crushing the Taiwanese people's confidence in the survival of their democracy. In turn, the alliance seems to believe this will ensure the pan-blue camp's victory in the next elections.
But the Taiwanese people can make sure that what actually unfolds will not follow that script.
For instance, the eagerness of the People First Party (PFP) to please its Beijing handlers by proposing the cross-strait peace advancement bill is placing KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
For Ma, this bill is better left untouched until after the next presidential election. Taking up the bill at this time forces him to show his cards earlier than he would prefer.
What had been envisaged as a Trojan horse therefore looks increasingly likely to be a bill that will blow up in pan-blue leaders' faces instead.
Conversely, the bill might be a blessing in disguise for the pan-green camp, given that it is revealing the blueprint on how a 2008 pan-blue president would conduct cross-strait affairs. It could therefore evolve into issues around which the Taiwanese people can rally against Ma and the KMT.
Should the pan-green camp prevail in the elections for 2008, the Taiwanese people will have proclaimed anew their preference for democracy and sovereignty over collective autocracy and "unification."
This renewed commitment would have profound implications internationally. The global community of democratic states would have to take this democracy seriously. Most importantly, Taiwan would have earned the respect of its two closest allies -- the US and Japan.
Gone would be Taiwan's image of being the weakest link in the chain of democracies in the western Pacific needed by the US to impede the spread of China's despotic capitalism.
Gone would be government backtracking -- under misguided US pressure -- on changing the national title and constitutional overhaul, matters of paramount importance to the continuing flourishing of Taiwan's democracy.
It is imperative, therefore, that the pan-green camp perform well in next month's elections, which are a warm-up for the big elections in a few years.
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS